Activity Stream

Filter
Sort By Time Show
Recent Recent Popular Popular Anytime Anytime Last 24 Hours Last 24 Hours Last 7 Days Last 7 Days Last 30 Days Last 30 Days All All Photos Photos Forum Forums Articles Articles Blog Blogs
Filter by: Last 24 Hours Clear All
  • DSchles's Avatar
    Today, 07:47 AM
    I was just rereading the thread and came across your question, which I had failed to respond to previously. So, the 0.52 would correspond to the 0.48, and then 0.43 would become 0.48, if we exclude...
    82 replies | 5899 view(s)
  • aceside's Avatar
    Today, 07:13 AM
    I agree I’m rude. Apologies! I have been seeking some clarification on these things, but nobody really cared, so I guess you are my answer. On these online calculators, the following is how they...
    82 replies | 5899 view(s)
  • Cacarulo's Avatar
    Today, 07:05 AM
    Perhaps, before reaching definitive conclusions such as "This is incorrect", it's good to consider what is known as the benefit of the doubt. For example, you could write: "I'm not sure about that...
    82 replies | 5899 view(s)
  • Cacarulo's Avatar
    Today, 06:50 AM
    Perhaps they prefer not to get involved in an endless questioning. Didn't you think about it? Sincerely, Cac
    82 replies | 5899 view(s)
  • aceside's Avatar
    Today, 06:07 AM
    I believe James989 and Gronbog know this stuff very well, but they have been silent.
    82 replies | 5899 view(s)
  • Eternalotsi's Avatar
    Today, 05:03 AM
    Deciding whether to stick with AP play is like pondering whether to double down or fold, ya know? It's a real head-scratcher, but hey, that's the beauty of poker—it's all about calculated risks.
    45 replies | 8677 view(s)
  • Cacarulo's Avatar
    Yesterday, 05:37 PM
    Sorry, I got confused and thought we were in the coin flip experiment, not in the BJ case. With 0.52, it's obviously going to be higher than with 0.43. Therefore, the numbers above for 0.43 and 0.48...
    82 replies | 5899 view(s)
  • Sidecount's Avatar
    Yesterday, 03:23 PM
    100 units probably means Time to Go. But there are other ways to take it up to 2 spots. I played with a superstitious guy who was a non-counter. He believed in 2 or 4 spots at the table for the...
    3 replies | 1197 view(s)
  • DSchles's Avatar
    Yesterday, 01:22 PM
    I missed this. Sorry. 0.698%. It seems to me that for blackjack winning and losing streaks, if the streak is NOT interrupted by ties, we shouldn't be using 0.43 and 0.48 for the win and lose...
    82 replies | 5899 view(s)
  • toolyp's Avatar
    Yesterday, 11:21 AM
    “This thread should have closed a long time ago, but I'll ask Norm to do as much now.” QED. That’s how you argue. “I suppose I've been answering streak questions for about 40-45 years or so.”...
    82 replies | 5899 view(s)
  • toolyp's Avatar
    Yesterday, 11:19 AM
    “toolyp is just an annoying troll, an arrogant newcomer” QED. That’s what you call respect! No offence, just my honest opinion.
    82 replies | 5899 view(s)
  • toolyp's Avatar
    Yesterday, 11:18 AM
    “Your opinion doesn't mean shit in a casino.” QED. The min-max spread used to be 5-1000=1-200. The casinos made it 5-500=1-100. All gamblers screamed SHIT! Now its mostly 1-10. SHIT! SHIT! SHIT! Im...
    82 replies | 5899 view(s)
No More Results

About Blackjack: The Forum

BJTF is an advantage player site based on the principles of comity. That is, civil and considerate behavior for the mutual benefit of all involved. The goal of advantage play is the legal extraction of funds from gaming establishments by gaining a mathematic advantage and developing the skills required to use that advantage. To maximize our success, it is important to understand that we are all on the same side. Personal conflicts simply get in the way of our goals.