This discussion is derailed. I guess James is asking, what is the player EV when playing like a computer who counts every cards and adjusts to perfect strategy at every decision points? Right?
Your scenario assumes that the speed at which the dealer shoots the ball and spins the roulette wheel is consistently the same or very close each time. You can use a stopwatch for timing and then...
There's a lot to unpack . This could be overwhelming if you are a newbie. Did you know what strategies you intended to compare e.g., Basic vs. Hi-Lo, Level 1 vs Level 2 or 3 Count system, Flat bet...
I agree with you that if player doesn't lose everything against a dealer's blackjack, HE = 0.609.
I also ran simulations with CVDATA, Flat Bet, Hi-Opt 2 Counting Strategy (Full Index), HE =...
It's a "disguised" game... Dealer takes a hole card, act as an American dealer would do when an Ace is showing but tweak it in an ENHC game with any other up card.
No, in that case, we would be talking about American rules. "Peek" or "no peek" has nothing to do with the house edge.
So let's go back to the previous rules where the player doesn't lose everything...
Dealer have hole card, but just Peeks on Ace, is it consider ENHC ?
I think it is just a "partially" Peek game, and we can't use ENHC rule to calculate it, just my two cents.
I have also sim this with CVDATA, Flat Bet, Hi-Opt 2 Counting Strategy(Full Index), and the HE = -0.588%, which I think is incorrect.
Can you please use CVDATA to verify my results ? Please note...