See the top rated post in this thread. Click here

Results 1 to 13 of 19

Thread: When to not surrender for cover...

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    3rd rock from Sol, Milky Way Galaxy
    Posts
    14,158


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by Mickey View Post
    I'm not quite sure what you mean by this. Why would he necessarily have min bet out during a 17 vs. A scenario? He could receive a hard 17 vs. A during high counts (w/ a big bet) as well.
    As the deck gets more T rich the dealer busts the Ace more and surrender is no longer the correct play. That is usually when you have big bets out. For HILO you surrender if the count is less than +1 (H17). You would have a min bet out. Of course you make your bet and playing decision at separate times so the play may be made at a different count than the bet was made at. You may use an ace neutral count and have a big bet out due to the excess aces left rather than a high playing count. So your bet and the play are only somewhat related.

  2. #2


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by Tthree View Post
    As the deck gets more T rich the dealer busts the Ace more and surrender is no longer the correct play. That is usually when you have big bets out. For HILO you surrender if the count is less than +1 (H17). You would have a min bet out. Of course you make your bet and playing decision at separate times so the play may be made at a different count than the bet was made at. You may use an ace neutral count and have a big bet out due to the excess aces left rather than a high playing count. So your bet and the play are only somewhat related.
    Tthree beat me to it Mickey. At high counts you would insure against the ace. If there isn't a 10 under there, the dealer can bust much easier. 17 may hold up, but only because busting is more likely and not because 17 is a good score against the dealer.

  3. #3
    Senior Member Mickey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Vegas
    Posts
    145


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by Tthree View Post
    As the deck gets more T rich the dealer busts the Ace more and surrender is no longer the correct play. That is usually when you have big bets out. For HILO you surrender if the count is less than +1 (H17). You would have a min bet out. Of course you make your bet and playing decision at separate times so the play may be made at a different count than the bet was made at. You may use an ace neutral count and have a big bet out due to the excess aces left rather than a high playing count. So your bet and the play are only somewhat related.
    Got it. Thanks, T3!

Similar Threads

  1. cover?
    By njrich in forum General Blackjack Forum
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 04-03-2013, 09:06 AM
  2. jblaze: Cover?
    By jblaze in forum Blackjack Main
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 07-19-2005, 01:21 PM
  3. Mr. Ed: Cover
    By Mr. Ed in forum Blackjack Main
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 03-14-2003, 06:59 PM
  4. anon: cover ala ian a.
    By anon in forum Main Forum
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 04-06-2002, 08:58 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

About Blackjack: The Forum

BJTF is an advantage player site based on the principles of comity. That is, civil and considerate behavior for the mutual benefit of all involved. The goal of advantage play is the legal extraction of funds from gaming establishments by gaining a mathematic advantage and developing the skills required to use that advantage. To maximize our success, it is important to understand that we are all on the same side. Personal conflicts simply get in the way of our goals.