-
Wildcard: Re: Could be a legal ploy
> Suppose they wanted a mass age or looks
> 'upgrade' of the cocktail waitress staff. A
> mass firing would probably result in a court
> date. Perhaps they have experienced suits
> already as occurred with flight attendants
> ages ago. But, by substituting them en masse
> with 'entertainers,' they not only change
> the job description - but redefine the job
> such that firing and hiring can take place
> without legal repercussion. You don't need a
> reason to terminate an entertainer. After a
> time, they can dump the idea and hire new
> cocktail waitresses.
I hadn't thought of that Norm, but I think you may well have hit the nail exactly on the head. This way they can "recycle" the "waitresses" at will and always appear to have the youngest and best, without age every entering into the picture.
Still a pathetic idea, if in fact this is the "behind the scenes" thought process that generated this decision. I haven't been to Rio in quite some time, so I can't give an opinion of the waitresses currently employed...musth've sent a shock wave through the entire staff!
-
pat: bottom line is this:
> I hadn't thought of that Norm, but I think
> you may well have hit the nail exactly on
> the head. This way they can
> "recycle" the
> "waitresses" at will and always
> appear to have the youngest and best,
> without age every entering into the picture.
> Still a pathetic idea, if in fact this is
> the "behind the scenes" thought
> process that generated this decision. I
> haven't been to Rio in quite some time, so I
> can't give an opinion of the waitresses
> currently employed...musth've sent a shock
> wave through the entire staff!
if the girls have been working since day one and they havent saved enough money to retire-thats their fault.who wants to waitress at a casino for 30 yars anyway.its a crappy job.the money is good but it gets old like any job.
-
Norm Wattenberger: Re: Could be a legal ploy
> I haven't been to Rio in quite some time, so I
> can't give an opinion of the waitresses
> currently employed...musth've sent a shock
> wave through the entire staff!
I was there last month and they were nothing to write home about. Could be I was on an off-day - or have different tastes.
Firing the entire staff sounds pretty crude no matter what the curcumstance.
-
Clyde Western: Re: legal question about nude chicks
Becausew they are serving drinks, won't hair nets be required?
-
Moose: Peter's Principle in action *NM*
-
Moose: Though I wish they would..
Now *THAT'S* beavertainment
M.
-
10Splitter: Re: No sympathy here
While I agree with much of what you are saying...
I doubt that these girls are making $100,000,000.00 (100000K) at these jobs.
10Splitter
-
hip hop: That would be ALOT of tips! *NM*
-
Franz Joseph: Re: legal question about nude chicks
Nude shows and simulated or real sex acts are prohibited in Atlantic City casinos by Casino Control Commission regulations. I think that nude or even topless waitresses are also prohibited.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Bookmarks