NEW Card Counting System! (CAC2 + CAC2 Enhanced)

[Lester]

I've been using CAC2 at the tables for a couple of months; um, something about a couple of billion sims gives me confidence. I started with FELT years ago but switched over to CAC2. I assume this Cacarulo guy knows what he's talking about. For whatever it's worth, I'm up a couple of grand at the tables and consistently up when I play against Cassie in Casino Verite.

[Cacarulo]

I've been using CAC2 at the tables for a couple of months; um, something about a couple of billion sims gives me confidence. I started with FELT years ago but switched over to CAC2. I assume this Cacarulo guy knows what he's talking about. For whatever it's worth, I'm up a couple of grand at the tables and consistently up when I play against Cassie in Casino Verite.

I'm glad to hear that things are going well for you. I hope this positive variance continues to stay on your side for a long time.

Sincerely,
Cac

[Lester]

Oh wow. Got crushed this weekend. All time at the tables, I'm making $2/hour. Live and learn. Was playing near perfect. Lady luck.

[James989]

My BJ game rules : 8D, S17, NoDAS, DOA, SPL1, NoSurr, Peek on ACE but No Peek on TEN, No Insurance.


CASE 1 - 20 billion rounds, 50% Penetration, Burn Card =7, Flat Bet, use full CAC2 indices except HARD DOUBLE 11 vs T index change to -8, EV1 = ?


CASE 2 - 20 billion rounds, 50% Penetration, Burn Card =7, Flat Bet, use full CAC2 indices except HARD DOUBLE 11 vs T index change to +8, EV2 = ?


Could anyone here sim these two cases ?


Theoretically EV2 is > than EV1 because my game rules is NO PEEK ON TEN. However, my CVDATA sim results for EV1= -0.605% and EV2 = -0.683%, what is the reason ?

CASE3.jpg

[Cacarulo]

My BJ game rules : 8D, S17, NoDAS, DOA, SPL1, NoSurr, Peek on ACE but No Peek on TEN, No Insurance.


CASE 1 - 20 billion rounds, 50% Penetration, Burn Card =7, Flat Bet, use full CAC2 indices except HARD DOUBLE 11 vs T index change to -8, EV1 = ?


CASE 2 - 20 billion rounds, 50% Penetration, Burn Card =7, Flat Bet, use full CAC2 indices except HARD DOUBLE 11 vs T index change to +8, EV2 = ?


Could anyone here sim these two cases ?


Theoretically EV2 is > than EV1 because my game rules is NO PEEK ON TEN. However, my CVDATA sim results for EV1= -0.605% and EV2 = -0.683%, what is the reason ?

CASE3.jpg

I have already responded to you privately.

Sincerely,
Cac

[James989]

I have already responded to you privately.

Sincerely,
Cac

Thanks Cac, I most probably not simulating it correctly, I've checked my simulation input data over the past few days and haven't found any errors, could anyone here help me to sim it correctly ?

BJ game with rules : 8D, S17, NoDAS, DOA, SPL1, NoSurr, Peek on ACE but No Peek on TEN, No Insurance, 20 billion rounds, 50% Penetration, Burn Card =7, Flat Bet, CAC2 counting system.