It's a "disguised" game... Dealer takes a hole card, act as an American dealer would do when an Ace is showing but tweak it in an ENHC game with any other up card.
I agree with you that if player doesn't lose everything against a dealer's blackjack, HE = 0.609.
I also ran simulations with CVDATA, Flat Bet, Hi-Opt 2 Counting Strategy (Full Index), HE = -0.588%, which I believe is incorrect.
Can you/anyone here use CVDATA to verify my results? Please note that the rule is Peek on Ace( No Peek on Ten !), so you should modify the playing strategy index of all BJ hand vs T.
10 billions CVDATA sims results(Peek on Ace but NO on Ten) :-
HE(1 round/shoe, no cut card effect) = 0.697%
HE(cut card effect, 50% penetration) = 0.713%
HE(cut card effect, 50% penetration, Hi-Opt 2 full index, Flat Bet) = 0.668%
HE(cut card effect, 50% penetration, Hi-Opt 2 full index, 1-15 spread) = 0.013%.
The cut card effect is about 0.016. I found that no of deck will affect the cut card effect, penetration totally not affect the cut card effect, true ??
BTW, could you please sim this game with your CAC2 Enhanced counting system(50% penetration, Flat Bet) ? Just want to have a comparison.
Last edited by James989; 04-28-2024 at 07:48 PM.
With CAC2 + 52 indices, 50% pen, CCE, peek on ACE but not on TEN, I obtained a House Edge (HE) of 0.583%. Then, given that against a ten, everything
is lost if the dealer gets BJ, I removed the doubling indices vs. T and splitting indices vs. T (88vT). With those changes, the HE was 0.668%.
Hope this helps.
Sincerely,
Cac
Luck is what happens when preparation meets opportunity.
Bookmarks