Surrendering 8,8 vs 10

[BigJer]

I have probably written about this 20 times or more over the years.

Wong's indices for this play are incorrect. For multi-deck Hi-Lo, surrender with NDAS is +1 and with DAS is +2.

21 and counting!

Don

Don. What about for his other indices?

[DSchles]

I'm sorry, but my remarks were intended for, and directly underneath, the post of Tthree.

Don

[Freightman]

I'm sorry, but my remarks were intended for, and directly underneath, the post of Tthree.

Don

Are you sure? Posts are time stamped, my time zone as T3 10.20, Freightman 10.44 and Don 11.31 respectively. Both are good posts. Suggest you directly mention names, since, one way or the other, you goofed on this one.

[Three]

This is one of the best posts you have ever written. Very nicely done!

Don

Thanks Don.

[DSchles]

Sigh. In my thread, my response is directly under Tthree's post. What's more, I responded by "Post Quick Reply" directly to HIS post. So, explain to me please how I "goofed."

Don

[BigJer]

Sigh. In my thread, my response is directly under Tthree's post. What's more, I responded by "Post Quick Reply" directly to HIS post. So, explain to me please how I "goofed."

Don

So it wasn't meant for me. OMG!! Thank you Don!! Thank you!!

[BigJer]

I'm sorry, but my remarks were intended for, and directly underneath, the post of Tthree.

Don

That's because you are in Threaded or Hybrid mode. That's why I usually quote the post above me.

[Freightman]

Sigh. In my thread, my response is directly under Tthree's post. What's more, I responded by "Post Quick Reply" directly to HIS post. So, explain to me please how I "goofed."

Don

Your obviously in hybrid view, I'm in linear oldest view. The time stamps as stated are correct. It may be obvious in your view as it seemed obvious in mine, which suggests you should actually refer to whom you're addressing.