Hi Norm,
You've probably answered this question many times before (I did do a search of the postings, but didn't find the answer yet), but can you explain why you think the Zen count (latest, copyright 2005) is more powerful using the true count = running count / # decks, rather than the true edge = running count / # quarter decks?
Is it something to do with what happens when the penetration is above 75%? It seems that if you use Arnold's conversion system (multiply by 4), that it wouldn't change anything. Or maybe you're talking about an older Zen count? Thanks again for your thoughts!
Bookmarks