>Your continued claim that it is without "valid reason" is incorrect. I don't know why you fail to understand this.
>Your claim that calling a post stupid is the same as suggesting that I "know" what I'm saying is false -- in essence calling me a liar, is way off base. Wikipedia has a very long essay on what is a personal attack. You wrongly accused me of lying. That is a personal attack. ICNT said your "post" was stupid, not that you were stupid. Please realize the difference between calling a person stupid and calling a post stupid. I call myself an idiot several times a day. I have certainly made stupid posts and thank anyone pointing such out. How else does one quickly learn? Indeed, look at the bottom of my post where I call myself an idiot.
Realize that a little knowledge is a dangerous thing. You are arguing against folks with decades of research behind them. Doesn't mean we are correct. New ideas are welcome. But, when they go against already covered ground -- expect negative feedback.
Further, realize that we are constantly attacked for blocking people and for not blocking people. Sometimes by the very same posters.
Bookmarks