>The thread was clearly going off the rails.
>It was not a yellow threat.
>With due respect to Stanford, I would not trust a fringe index generated on a 1975 era PC. Braun generated Hi-Opt II indices on a multimillion dollar IBM 7044 mainframe and did not have an index for that hand.
>If you spent five seconds learning those indexes, go ahead and use them if you wish. But, hyping the usefulness of one overall stat that is not used for index generation when an impressionable member is making it sound like this is of general value is not good.
>The correct EV-max index for 3,2v5 is +14. RA index, which gains the most money, is +15. That count occurs in about one in 100,000 hands for all possible hands. Less than one in a million for that hand at that count. +12 DD with a max bet, which you would be using at that count, would be an error.
>I have been spending ten hours a day trying to add new functionality to beat new rules and am under constant interruption. I have no time for this squabbling.

325.jpg