Quote Originally Posted by DSchles View Post
No, it would make no sense to think that the SCORE for scenario B is S2 + S3. It's fine to use the metric of SCORE for each half of the shoe, but that value is gained for only a half at a time. So, while you might be tempted to say that the overall SCORE for scenario B is (more properly, I think) (S2 + S3)/2, this has the "feel" to me of a root-mean-square calculation. Try sqrt(S2^2 + S3^2) for the SCORE of scenario B.

Don
Hi Don,

I've also considered that root-mean-square, but my problem is that I'm not sure which "mean" is the most accurate. If it were EVs, it would be simpler since the problem is solved by adding EV1 + EV2.
I thought about adding the SCOREs as if it were a sum of Win Rates, that's why I thought of S2 + S3. Or perhaps SCORE isn't the most suitable for this calculation. Let's consider that S1 plays 100
hands per hour while S2 and S3 each play half of that. I don't know, the result doesn't give me confidence.

Sincerely,
Cac