> N0 can be applied to any form of wagering; you just
> have to stipulate your terms. For all of my Chapter 10
> charts, the bets are fixed, and the N0s that are
> provided assume such fixed-bet wagering.

> Yes. I believe that all of Brett's studies were done
> with the assumption of optimal Kelly wagering.

> Just plug in the number: Growth rate (logarithmic) is
> 1 + 1/28,000 = 1.0000357.

> But, we really can't relate to such a number. That's
> why SCORE is easier to follow.

> Don

So one can have a fixed bet NO and a continuous resizing NO. I did not know this!

What does the answer 1.0000357 mean?

I have bja2 and bja3, is there an easy way to convert the fixed SCORE to a continuous resizing SCORE?

Thank you again for your time.