> Et says absolutely nothing about "terms
> of fractions". He's claiming discards
> can be pre-arranged so casinos will have
> 100% control of the game.

I never said the casino could get "100% control of the game. I said:

"... the machines have 100% control of the interlacing. Ie. 100% control of where every card will land in relation to its original position."

That's a very different thing.

> This is
> impossible. You seem to think he's talking
> about increasing house edge 100%, as in,.5%
> to 1%,etc.etc...this is not the case.

You're right. I doubt the delta would be as large as 0.5%

> implying,inventing,imagining,creating,dicovering,
> and discussing ways casinos can benefit from a
> new age of techno-cheating!?

Who said anything about cheating? There is no rule that guarantees anything about the randomness of any shuffle. (Trackers are very glad of that!)

> We have nothing to gain by this thread.

Finally there's something we can agree on.

ETF