I would like you to analyze the simplest simulations possible using a canned program you have for HL simulations making only six strategy changes that I will outline below using the AA78mTc. Continue to use the HL for all other strategy changes and for betting. I am asking you to use the HL and not the KO since he HL is balanced and involves less changes and less chances for errors than if you used the KO for example. I want to isolate only these six changes that I will outline below with the HL count.
Let Tc = pseudo Ten Count = HL + AA78mTc where AA78mTc means the Ace is counts ias + 2, the 7 and 8 as +1 and the Tens as -1.
Please look at the following attached file:
HL & AA78mTc.jpg
You will see that if you calculated Tc = pseudo Ten count = HL + AA78mTc, you get a count which has a CC of over 98% with a perfect Ten count. Now what we will do is use the best of both. Use the HL where the HL is the better count and use the Tc where the Tc is the better count.
So what I would like you to do then is get a program that simulates the HL and make only the six changes to that program where the Tc is used instead of using the HL. dr = decks remaining.
(1) Insure if Tc = HL + AA78mTc >= 4*dr
(2) Stand on hard 12 v 2 if Tc = KO + AA78mTc >= 4*dr
(3) Stand on hard 12 v 3 if Tc = KO + AA78mTc >= 2*dr
(4) Stand on hard 12 v 4 if Tc = KO + AA78mTc >= 0
(5) Stand on hard 12 v 5 if Tc = KO + AA78mTc >= (-2)*dr
(6) Stand on hard 12 v 6 if Tc = KO + AA78mTc >= (-1)*dr
Make ONLY the above six changes in your HL simulation program. Continue to use the HL for betting and for all other playing strategy variations.
Then compare the results of the HL with these six changes with the HL alone and let me know what happens.
Bookmarks