You do not need someone asking the same questions to repeat yourself, you do repeat yourself in the same posts. Try post #456 with the following two lines:Originally Posted by bjanalyst
"I said over and over and over again that HL with AA78mTc and 5m6c was NOT my selected count."
"But HL with AA78mTc and 5m6c was NEVER my selected count."
Last edited by BoSox; 01-28-2019 at 06:11 AM.
I don't know why you keep saying this. As I pointed out to you, I did not use a "canned" HiLo program. My software is a fully configurable simulation system capable of simulating a wide variety of different counts and systems. With a minor software enhancement and using my existing HiLo configuration as a base, I was easily able to simulate your system. With the infrastructure already done, it would be just as easy for me to simulate your KO system.
And that was because there were no betting adjustments specified. Yet, at the time, you were still predicting that The HiLo+AA78mTc system would outperform HiOpt II + ASC, even before you added the 5m6c.
This is the same premise that you used to support your HiLo+AA78mTc prediction. Don told you that the CC of the individual playing decisions would not be a predictor of the overall strength of the system, and he was right.
Please stop speaking for me. I may not have been clear, but what I was trying to tell you is that people have been tweaking other weaker systems with side counts trying to outperform HiOpt II + ASC for a long time with no success. I do happen to know of a few completely original systems which can outperform HiOpt II + ASC.
Having now seen the HiLo+AA78mTc+5m6c results, I don't believe that tweaking KO will be any more successful in beating HiOpt II + ASC than tweaking HiLo was. But I suppose there's only one way to find out ...
At the end of the day, HiOpt II + ASC is an extremely powerful system and only side counts a single card. You will not only need to beat it, but you need to do so with the same or smaller degree of difficulty before anyone will consider using your system(s).
I’ve already asked bjanalyst to create an account for Carla so she can speak for herself, rather than through bjanalyst...but so far he has ignored my post, which is strange since he replies to everybody else.
Im starting to think Carla is someone in bjanalyst’s imagination.
Please use this updated KO with 5m7c attached. I added a note on how to simplify the KO + k*(5m7c) >= crc(Idx) formulas which can be used when the Index falls outside of the range of the table of critical running counts and I have added basic strategy late surrender hits using 5m7c and also I made a very minor change and changed k = 2 to k = 1.5 for surrendering hard 15 v 8, that is surrender hard 15 v 8 with KO + 1.5*(5m7c) >= crc(8). So if you do not want to use both 5m7c and AA89mTc and only want to use one side count then here is a one page file on KO with 5m7c if you choose 5m7c to help with betting. It also helps with a bunch of strategy changes as you can see.
KO & 5m7c.jpg
We play 5 out of 6 dealt dealt S17, DAS, LS with Lucky Ladies (LL). We use KO as the base count. I have always suggseetd the KO count. I only had the HL with side counts analyzed as changes to a canned sim HL program were easier than creatinig at KO sim program. And we play bj as a necessity to play LL. So we keep AA89mTc which give a PERFCT Ten count, Tc = KO + AA89mTc which was also use as the Lucky Lady count. LLc = Tc = KO + AA89mTc. I explained how we play in a previous post.
Point taken. But at least she could explain how easy it is to use KO and keep the two side counts you’re recommending. It’s always good to get first hand information from a person using your system. It’s called a testimonial and many companies use this method to sell their products. If what you’re saying about Carla and your system is correct, then it might help to strengthen the case for your system.
You must be a really disgusting person to put personal information about a supposed friend on an open board.
I think some of us would rather hear what she has to say about the game, versus your eccentric ideas.
Bosox, where do you get that I’m condoning him? Saying “point taken” only means I understand his point. It has NOTHING do with saying how I feel about it.
I guess I don’t try to be a judge of people like you. I’ll leave that to God...and you since you appear to like to judge people too.
I’m simply asking bjanaylst to have Carla express her views on his system. I’m asking him to do the same thing you are, except I’m not judging him like you.
Be very wary of Mr. Contrary!
Also, bjanalysts description of their friend "Carla" as "not that bright" infuriates me to no end. Who the fuck calls their friend an idiot in that sense?
All to sell a fucking book containing an idea that has been demonstrated to be worthless!
What a joke!
No one would be surprised by how you feel on any subject. You already set the standard around here, by constantly stating in one form or another that all casino personnel represents upstanding honest people.
Posting Permissions
-*-
Bookmarks