Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 14 to 21 of 21

Thread: Gonzo: Good game for trade

  1. #14
    Slot M. Student
    Guest

    Slot M. Student: trading with Chance King

    Somebody calling him/her/itself Chance King wanted identifying information like a casino would like to have about me. He/she/it refused to cooperate unless he/she/it could expose me to casinos and to detectives; but he/she/it did not offer to give info which could be used to expose him or her to casinos. :-)

    If this is the same writer, are you sure you do not need a very good buffer and referee?

    Slot

    > Thanks Don but King and I don't need a
    > referee when we exchange info.

    > This thread should have refreshed some of
    > his bad memories.

    > Rgds.

  2. #15
    CHANCE KING
    Guest

    CHANCE KING: don..good suggestion..only one problem..

    > Thanks Don but King and I don't need a
    > referee when we exchange info.

    > This thread should have refreshed some of
    > his bad memories.

    > Rgds.

    don..problem will be that parker gets to know all the info!! ..how to solve that one??

    wong lai..agree ..he would be the last person i need a referee for trading info.. and on my part will always be considered an invaluable friend who has helped me a lot ..(dont know about his part tho.!!..there are others in this thread like SLOT STUDENT ...who thinks very badly of me but not worth a reply ..)
    ..enough people know of me and i am more than willing to provide my whereabouts,phone contact for anyone NEW wishing to call me straightaway to establish contact..

  3. #16
    Wong Lai
    Guest

    Wong Lai: Re: trading with Chance King

    > Somebody calling him/her/itself Chance King
    > wanted identifying information like a casino
    > would like to have about me. He/she/it
    > refused to cooperate unless he/she/it could
    > expose me to casinos and to detectives; but
    > he/she/it did not offer to give info which
    > could be used to expose him or her to
    > casinos. :-)

    > If this is the same writer, are you sure you
    > do not need a very good buffer and referee?

    > Slot

    I know what I mean when I give a statement.There is mutual trust between the two of us that you can never understand.

    And I think it is VERY rude to address someone with an "IT",whether or not you think it's funny.

    WL

  4. #17
    CHANCE KING
    Guest

    CHANCE KING: vote of confidence

    > I know what I mean when I give a
    > statement.There is mutual trust between the
    > two of us that you can never understand.

    > And I think it is VERY rude to address
    > someone with an "IT",whether or
    > not you think it's funny.

    > WL

    thank you my friend ..at least i got one vote of confidence .. ..and in fact a rough count i did just now ..showed i been to over twenty countries now since the beginning of this year..and no ,enough of you know ythat i did this not as a casino manager or whatever but as a player ..tho some of you critise me for only like to travel ..not too keen on making serious money play !!
    well..i dont have the big Bankroll like some of you fellows ok???

  5. #18
    Slot M. Student
    Guest

    Slot M. Student: Funny / apology, request, questions

    FIRST
    My language was not good enough for me to know how to refer to corporations, partnerships and other non-humans.

    SECOND
    Perhaps you would be good enough to give an English lesson on that particular point. And perhaps you would be good enough to give an English lesson on how to use "him," "her," "he" and "she."

    THIRD
    It is interesting to learn that you know the identity of the one who wrote to me. Thank you for telling us all. And you have aroused my curiosity. How did you determine that this poster is the one who wrote directly to me?

    FOURTH
    In view of your mutual trust I am perplexed: What is all the expression of uncertainty concerning proceeding about? Could it be true that you trust you will not be dealt with at all well?

    Or did *you* mean to be funny?

    Slot

    > I know what I mean when I give a
    > statement.There is mutual trust between the
    > two of us that you can never understand.

    > And I think it is VERY rude to address
    > someone with an "IT",whether or
    > not you think it's funny.

    > WL

  6. #19
    Wong Lai
    Guest

    Wong Lai: Apology??

    Excuse me for my level of English language as an Oriental,I do not comprehend any word or sentence in your message which reflect your sincerity for your apology.

    > FIRST
    > My language was not good enough for me to
    > know how to refer to corporations,
    > partnerships and other non-humans.

    I do not like to comment on this as I believe readers of this page can judge you from your post.

    > SECOND
    > Perhaps you would be good enough to give an
    > English lesson on that particular point. And
    > perhaps you would be good enough to give an
    > English lesson on how to use
    > "him," "her,"
    > "he" and "she."

    PERHAPS you do not sincerely mean what you had written.

    > THIRD
    > It is interesting to learn that you know the
    > identity of the one who wrote to me. Thank
    > you for telling us all. And you have aroused
    > my curiosity. How did you determine that
    > this poster is the one who wrote directly to
    > me?

    Please read the whole thread carefully.I know Chance King in person but I did not have any knowledge of your correspondence with him until you post it here.Why are you so sensitive about this?

    > FOURTH
    > In view of your mutual trust I am perplexed:
    > What is all the expression of uncertainty
    > concerning proceeding about? Could it be
    > true that you trust you will not be dealt
    > with at all well?

    Again,please read carefully that there was no intended trade between the two of us.He was doubtful about the sincerity of certain people who wished to trade.Responding to his post,I was only giving my point of view.
    My apology to all,especially to Don,who responded if I did not make myself clear.

    > Or did *you* mean to be funny?

    For more than ten years,I play BJ for a living.I visit BJ sites to share my views and to accept comments and advice from fellow counters hoping to improve my knowledge in this game.Every BJ related matters is taken seriously.I do not think there is anything funny in this discussion.
    Last but not least,a smiley sign at the end of the sentence does not give you the privilege of being rude or sarcastic.

    Wong Lai

  7. #20
    Don Schlesinger
    Guest

    Don Schlesinger: OK, enough

    I think this thread has gone far enough. We understand everyone's point of view.

    It's time to move on.

    Don

  8. #21
    BJT
    Guest

    BJT: Re: trading with Chance King

    I trade with Chance King and have met him frequently in casinos all over the world. I trust him.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

About Blackjack: The Forum

BJTF is an advantage player site based on the principles of comity. That is, civil and considerate behavior for the mutual benefit of all involved. The goal of advantage play is the legal extraction of funds from gaming establishments by gaining a mathematic advantage and developing the skills required to use that advantage. To maximize our success, it is important to understand that we are all on the same side. Personal conflicts simply get in the way of our goals.