> I remember Karel Janecek was advocating a RA
> index for this play at something like +8 or
> +9 (or even better not double at all)!
You're confusing this with 10 v. 10.
Don
> I remember Karel Janecek was advocating a RA
> index for this play at something like +8 or
> +9 (or even better not double at all)!
You're confusing this with 10 v. 10.
Don
> You're confusing this with 10 v. 10.
> Don
No, we were talking about ENHC games. Actually, doubling 10 vs. 10 in hole card games has very similar indices with 11 vs. 10 in ENHC. The only difference is that in the first example you pray for the Ace, while in the second case you pray the dealer won't get that ace:-).
Regards,
Orson
> Wrong!
> On +3.1 EV of doubling 11 vs 10 = EV of
> hitting. Start to double on 3.5 or 4. If you
> will fail to do so it will cost you money.
> Do you double 9 vs 2 on +1? Start to double
> on +4...Same mistake!
Risk averse indices are not about maximising EV. They're about maximising SCORE.
> Risk averse indices are not about maximising
> EV. They're about maximising SCORE.
i am so confused now i guess i just dont double!! btw are there any other good websites like this for internatinal players .. bj21 ..is quite dead..
thanks..
> i am so confused now i guess i just dont
> double!! btw are there any other good
> websites like this for internatinal players
> .. bj21 ..is quite dead..
> thanks..
Yes, risk averse is to optimise the score. Score is function of EV and risk. So the decision depends on smb BR, rules etc. In order to reduce the risk we take insurance on less than TC=3, on 2-2.5, we double at half -one number higher. But there is some point when serious EV reduction affects SCORE seriously!
Hey, double on 11 vs 10 on 4 or more!
In order to check it just run SBA with different index on 11 vs double...
> btw are there any other good
> websites like this for internatinal players
> .. bj21 ..is quite dead..
What's wrong with this one?
I mean, how many do you need?
Agree this site is so interesting regarding Europe etc. from the stand point of a UK player.Thanks to travelled posters. Thanks.BB.
> What's wrong with this one?
> I mean, how many do you need?
well ..you know how being orientals are ...greedy.. camp at candystores .. cant keep good info to themselves ..got to teach a few more buddies.. ever see how we pile up at a buffet?
and some muslims cant make do with one wife .. they NEED four..
> Hi there,
> Are you saying the introduction of CSM's in
> Germany was dirctly down to cheating by
> staff and players from the casinos?
No, cheating staff and players happenened there at the roulette tables. Introduction of cameras was directly down from cheating staff and players.
> And if so how would the introduction of
> CSM's stop this from occuring ?
> Regards,
> Mr.Pro
Posting Permissions
-*-
Bookmarks