See the top rated post in this thread. Click here

Page 8 of 8 FirstFirst ... 678
Results 92 to 103 of 103

Thread: Negative ev

  1. #92


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by Cacarulo View Post
    My simulator works just like SBA (keep in mind that I developed it over 25 years ago), and my results are indeed negatively impacted, which I find difficult to understand.
    You're playing the game at an advantage. The more rounds, the greater the edge. Why wouldn't the results be negatively impacted if you take away a round? Conversely, if you were playing BS on every round and flat betting, wouldn't you prefer not to have received that round?

    Don

  2. #93


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by DSchles View Post
    You're playing the game at an advantage. The more rounds, the greater the edge. Why wouldn't the results be negatively impacted if you take away a round? Conversely, if you were playing BS on every round and flat betting, wouldn't you prefer not to have received that round?

    Don
    Did you see my post above about the difference in results between face up and face down?


    Do you think that explains the difference in results we were seeing?
    The Cash Cow.

  3. #94


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by DSchles View Post
    You're playing the game at an advantage. The more rounds, the greater the edge. Why wouldn't the results be negatively impacted if you take away a round? Conversely, if you were playing BS on every round and flat betting, wouldn't you prefer not to have received that round?

    Don
    You’re absolutely right, that’s the difference between my software and Norm’s.
    Clearly, by discarding that last round, my SCOREs are going to be lower than if I didn’t discard it and tried to finish it.
    Thanks for opening my eyes!
    As for playing with basic strategy and flat betting, there wouldn’t be any difference. The expected value of round 1 will be the same as round 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, etc.

    Sincerely,
    Cac
    Luck is what happens when preparation meets opportunity.

  4. #95


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by Cacarulo View Post
    As for playing with basic strategy and flat betting, there wouldn’t be any difference.
    Yes, there would.

    Quote Originally Posted by Cacarulo View Post
    The expected value of round 1 will be the same as round 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, etc.
    Right. But you will play one more round at a negative expectation! If I offered to pay you what you lost playing BS for two different deals, one with removing all the discards and thereby canceling the round, and one with playing out the hand, which would you prefer?

    Don

  5. #96


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by moo321 View Post
    Did you see my post above about the difference in results between face up and face down?


    Do you think that explains the difference in results we were seeing?
    Yes. Of course, I don't know if it explains ALL of the difference, but it clearly makes a difference. I've seen DD dealt face up, but never single deck. Then again, in my 49 years of playing the game, I've only spent about 45 minutes playing single deck (in Tahoe)!

    Don

  6. #97


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by DSchles View Post
    Yes, there would.

    Right. But you will play one more round at a negative expectation! If I offered to pay you what you lost playing BS for two different deals, one with removing all the discards and thereby canceling the round, and one with playing out the hand, which would you prefer?

    Don
    Ahh, I understood what you meant. Actually, I shouldn’t be playing any round of a game with negative expectation.

    Sincerely,
    Cac
    Luck is what happens when preparation meets opportunity.

  7. #98


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    The only SD type game I've ever seen dealt face up is SF21.

  8. #99


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by DSchles View Post
    Yes. Of course, I don't know if it explains ALL of the difference, but it clearly makes a difference. I've seen DD dealt face up, but never single deck. Then again, in my 49 years of playing the game, I've only spent about 45 minutes playing single deck (in Tahoe)!
    Don
    If my memory serves me well, I played a SD game dealt face up in 2002 at Silver Club in Sparks, Nevada !
    G Man

  9. #100


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by DSchles View Post
    Yes. Of course, I don't know if it explains ALL of the difference, but it clearly makes a difference. I've seen DD dealt face up, but never single deck. Then again, in my 49 years of playing the game, I've only spent about 45 minutes playing single deck (in Tahoe)!

    Don
    I actually didn't think about it before I ran the sims. The default is for the sim to be face up.


    My memory was that most of the 6 to 5 single deck was dealt face up, as it was considered a carny game. I can certainly remember playing a number of face up games in both Vegas and Atlantic City. Maybe it's changed, and they're dealing it face down now, as I haven't been travelling to play as much as I used to.


    Is there anyone in Vegas or AC that can confirm whether the 6 to 5 single deck is being dealt face up or face down? It's somewhat of a bigger deal as far as results than I initially realized.
    The Cash Cow.

  10. #101
    Random number herder Norm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    The mote in God's eye
    Posts
    12,679
    Blog Entries
    59


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by moo321 View Post
    The default is for the sim to be face up.
    The default in the SD template is face down.
    "I don't think outside the box; I think of what I can do with the box." - Henri Matisse

  11. #102


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by Norm View Post
    The default in the SD template is face down.

    I am assuming all the sim data from face down games others have supplied did not use any counting by inference assumptions. That would make the numbers for face down games more interesting.

  12. #103
    Random number herder Norm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    The mote in God's eye
    Posts
    12,679
    Blog Entries
    59


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    I doubt if anyone uses that feature.
    "I don't think outside the box; I think of what I can do with the box." - Henri Matisse

Page 8 of 8 FirstFirst ... 678

Similar Threads

  1. negative progression
    By samsnead in forum The Disadvantage Forum
    Replies: 45
    Last Post: 09-10-2017, 05:23 PM
  2. Negative CE?
    By MJ1 in forum General Blackjack Forum
    Replies: 44
    Last Post: 05-18-2017, 03:04 PM
  3. When the count go negative
    By SURFER in forum General Blackjack Forum
    Replies: 24
    Last Post: 06-02-2014, 05:46 AM
  4. Replies: 2
    Last Post: 09-29-2006, 05:46 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

About Blackjack: The Forum

BJTF is an advantage player site based on the principles of comity. That is, civil and considerate behavior for the mutual benefit of all involved. The goal of advantage play is the legal extraction of funds from gaming establishments by gaining a mathematic advantage and developing the skills required to use that advantage. To maximize our success, it is important to understand that we are all on the same side. Personal conflicts simply get in the way of our goals.