BJ Tables in Argentina (question for House Edge expert)

[Seraph]

The game you describe is really horrible without the additional rules you mention.
Although it may not seem like it, those rules really make a difference. Let's see:


2) 8D, S17, D10, NDAS, SPA1, SPL1, NS, ENHC, BJ 3:2 but with the additional rules.
With optimal play, the house edge is 0.5650%.
Using a TD-BS (total dependent basic strategy), the house edge is 0.5731%.


Sincerely,
Cac

Hi Cac
First of all thank you for ALL of your replies.
Specially coming from a well respected member

Now, I cant actually understand the reason why the house edge change so much (from 0.8932%. to 0.5731%.)
Could you please elaborate a little if you dont mind?

Cause Im thinking on playing under those rules and is imposible to me to simulate those conditions on CVCX or even in CVDATA(already asked NORM and I cant SIM both rules together) and Im a little worry about the EV