NEW Card Counting System! (CAC2 + CAC2 Enhanced)

[ubiquitin]

The instructions for importing CAC into the CV iPhone app are in the document.

Thanks, got it. The phone app is exactly what I'm looking for, although my phone doesn't have the resolution for the full table drill. Still worth the $20.


Also just a general question- do any CAC2 experts have a recommendation for what my goal speed should be in being able to maintain running count for the CVBJ counting drills?

For the 2 card counting drill, i've been going with 1.5 second deal speed, 2 second test speed 36 card resolution.

For mixed 1-3, i've been using 2 second deal, 2 second test, 36 card resolution.

For the full table running count drill (6 hands), I've been using 18 second test speed/flash speed full hands. I usually average 4 rounds/minute on this drill.


Obviously my goal is 100% accuracy, but I'd also like to do so at a speed that is sufficient for effective play. And if anybody has other running count drill suggestions in CVBJ, please share-I'm a new user of the software.

[James989]

Dear All,

I am excited to share with you the birth of a revolutionary new card counting system. After growing tired of the same
old systems, I have dedicated years of research to developing a simple, yet powerful system that surpasses all known
ace-reckoned and balanced systems in terms of SCORE. In collaboration with Zenfighter, we have created a new approach
for calculating Playing Efficiency (PE) and Betting Efficiency (BE), as the existing methods were based on single deck and
less relevant plays in today’s blackjack landscape. Our focus has always been on shoes, as they are the most common
scenario in modern blackjack games.

During my research, I stumbled upon new tags with PE values that exceeded those of existing systems. I continued to push
further, conducting hundreds of simulations to compare the SCOREs of each system, ultimately discovering a groundbreaking
level-2 system that outperforms almost all commonly used systems, not only in 6D but also in 2D games. I have given the name
CAC2 to this system, and it exhibits superior performance compared to other systems such as Zen, Halves, UAPC, RPC, EBJ2, RAPC,
various level-3 and level-4 systems, and of course, all level-1 systems.

To provide a ranking based on the most common game conditions (6D, S17, DOA, DAS, SPA1, SPL3, NS, 4.5/6), I used the
top 22 indices (R22) that generate the highest SCORE for a counting system. These R22 indices are a modified version of the
well-known Catch-22 (C22) indices discussed in Don Schlesinger's book, Blackjack Attack, third edition. The only change I made
in the R22 is replacing 10vT with TTv4, which results in a better SCORE for most card counting systems.

I am thrilled to present CAC2 as a significant advancement based on much more accurate EORs than those used in the past,
which has allowed me to discover more relevant tags for modern play. Naturally, before offering the system for sale, it underwent
independent verification by renowned blackjack experts, including Norman Wattenberger. The table below was verified by him,
and the results are as follows:

Attachment 4983

Kindly note that the tags employed in the CAC2 system are not publicly accessible. This system is exclusively sold through
Norm's website, which offers comprehensive statistics, comparisons, indices, betting ramps, and other relevant information.
If you are interested in upgrading your current counting system to a more robust one, feel free to contact Norm for pricing details.
In addition, if you acquire CAC2 and already utilize Casino Vérité (CV), Norm may provide you with a special download that includes
all the necessary indices to complement CV. For those who opt to explore this novel counting system,
I assure you that you will not be dissatisfied.

I genuinely hope that you relish this new experience.

Enjoy!
Cacarulo

Most of the published index play is for American game(Peek, Late Surrender). Is your CAC2 Enhanced counting system include the index play for ES10, ESA and ENHC rules ?

I guess the index play for ES10, ESA and ENHC will be different.


Is CAC2 Enhanced level-2 system with Ace side count ?
Is CAC2 level-2 system WITHOUT Ace side count ?

[Cacarulo]

Most of the published index play is for American game(Peek, Late Surrender). Is your CAC2 Enhanced counting system include the index play for ES10, ESA and ENHC rules ?

I guess the index play for ES10, ESA and ENHC will be different.


Is CAC2 Enhanced level-2 system with Ace side count ?
Is CAC2 level-2 system WITHOUT Ace side count ?

In the main document (CAC2), there is a chapter dedicated exclusively to ENHC. In it, you will find indices for LS and ES (ESvA, ESv10).
CAC2 is a level 2 system, balanced and without secondary counts. However, in the accompanying document (Enhanced CAC2),
five methods of secondary counts (including Aces) are explained which increase the power of CAC2.

Sincerely,
Cac

[James989]

In the main document (CAC2), there is a chapter dedicated exclusively to ENHC. In it, you will find indices for LS and ES (ESvA, ESv10).
CAC2 is a level 2 system, balanced and without secondary counts. However, in the accompanying document (Enhanced CAC2),
five methods of secondary counts (including Aces) are explained which increase the power of CAC2.

Sincerely,
Cac

How to purchase your counting system ? Do you accept cryptocurrency?

[Cacarulo]

How to purchase your counting system ? Do you accept cryptocurrency?

https://qfit.com/orders.htm#CAC2

Sincerely,
Cac

[James989]

Dear All,

I am excited to share with you the birth of a revolutionary new card counting system. After growing tired of the same
old systems, I have dedicated years of research to developing a simple, yet powerful system that surpasses all known
ace-reckoned and balanced systems in terms of SCORE. In collaboration with Zenfighter, we have created a new approach
for calculating Playing Efficiency (PE) and Betting Efficiency (BE), as the existing methods were based on single deck and
less relevant plays in today’s blackjack landscape. Our focus has always been on shoes, as they are the most common
scenario in modern blackjack games.

During my research, I stumbled upon new tags with PE values that exceeded those of existing systems. I continued to push
further, conducting hundreds of simulations to compare the SCOREs of each system, ultimately discovering a groundbreaking
level-2 system that outperforms almost all commonly used systems, not only in 6D but also in 2D games. I have given the name
CAC2 to this system, and it exhibits superior performance compared to other systems such as Zen, Halves, UAPC, RPC, EBJ2, RAPC,
various level-3 and level-4 systems, and of course, all level-1 systems.

To provide a ranking based on the most common game conditions (6D, S17, DOA, DAS, SPA1, SPL3, NS, 4.5/6), I used the
top 22 indices (R22) that generate the highest SCORE for a counting system. These R22 indices are a modified version of the
well-known Catch-22 (C22) indices discussed in Don Schlesinger's book, Blackjack Attack, third edition. The only change I made
in the R22 is replacing 10vT with TTv4, which results in a better SCORE for most card counting systems.

I am thrilled to present CAC2 as a significant advancement based on much more accurate EORs than those used in the past,
which has allowed me to discover more relevant tags for modern play. Naturally, before offering the system for sale, it underwent
independent verification by renowned blackjack experts, including Norman Wattenberger. The table below was verified by him,
and the results are as follows:

Attachment 4983

Kindly note that the tags employed in the CAC2 system are not publicly accessible. This system is exclusively sold through
Norm's website, which offers comprehensive statistics, comparisons, indices, betting ramps, and other relevant information.
If you are interested in upgrading your current counting system to a more robust one, feel free to contact Norm for pricing details.
In addition, if you acquire CAC2 and already utilize Casino Vérité (CV), Norm may provide you with a special download that includes
all the necessary indices to complement CV. For those who opt to explore this novel counting system,
I assure you that you will not be dissatisfied.

I genuinely hope that you relish this new experience.

Enjoy!
Cacarulo

Could you please add in SCORE of Hi-Opt 2 counting system ? Just want to know how much better CAC2 is than Hi-Opt2.

[Cacarulo]

Could you please add in SCORE of Hi-Opt 2 counting system ? Just want to know how much better CAC2 is than Hi-Opt2.

Hi-Opt II with an ace side count is superior to all systems that DO NOT use any side count, including CAC2 in its standard version.
Having said that, in order to compare apples to apples, CAC2 or any other system must necessarily incorporate an ace side count.
I explain this in detail in the enhanced document. The resulting SCORE of CAC2/A is similar to that of Hi-Opt II/A. However,
there are other combinations of side counts that, if properly combined, make it superior. Of course, they require a well-prepared
memory and mind. I am more in favor of simplicity, even if it means a slightly lower SCORE.

Sincerely,
Cac

[James989]

Hi-Opt II with an ace side count is superior to all systems that DO NOT use any side count, including CAC2 in its standard version.
Having said that, in order to compare apples to apples, CAC2 or any other system must necessarily incorporate an ace side count.
I explain this in detail in the enhanced document. The resulting SCORE of CAC2/A is similar to that of Hi-Opt II/A. However,
there are other combinations of side counts that, if properly combined, make it superior. Of course, they require a well-prepared
memory and mind. I am more in favor of simplicity, even if it means a slightly lower SCORE.

Sincerely,
Cac

I am more in favor of simplicity as well and I am not interested in ace side count, in order to compare apples to apples, I think it is fair to make a comparison between SCORE of Hi Opt II (without ace side count) vs SCORE CAC2(without ace side count).


May I know what is the SCORE of Hi Opt II (without ace side count) ?

[Cacarulo]

I am more in favor of simplicity as well and I am not interested in ace side count, in order to compare apples to apples, I think it is fair to make a comparison between SCORE of Hi Opt II (without ace side count) vs SCORE CAC2(without ace side count).


May I know what is the SCORE of Hi Opt II (without ace side count) ?

No problem, I have those SCOREs for the following rules: 6D, S17, DOA, DAS, SPA1, SPL3, NS, 4.5/6, and R22 indices:

CAC2

1-12: 23.66
1-16: 27.73

Hi-Opt II

1-12: 21.89
1-16: 25.68

Sincerely,
Cac

[DSchles]

I am more in favor of simplicity as well and I am not interested in ace side count, in order to compare apples to apples, I think it is fair to make a comparison between SCORE of Hi Opt II (without ace side count) vs SCORE CAC2(without ace side count).


May I know what is the SCORE of Hi Opt II (without ace side count) ?

You're entitled to ask for whatever you want, but realize that the comparison is badly flawed. Hi-Opt II requires a side count of aces because it doesn't count the ace in the primary count. Not keeping the side count cripples the system. CAC2 counts the ace in the primary count and, therefore, doesn't require the side count, which makes it much simpler. But Cac has never made the claim that his count will outperform Hi-Opt II when the latter is used the way it is intended to be used.

Don

[iCountNTrack]

I haven't looked at CAC-2 and I am sure it's a great system, but I have to say that Hi-Opt2 with ASC is a really powerful system that has never ceased to amaze me especially for 2D games where you can get 100+ SCORE fairly quickly with a moderate bet spread

[James989]

No problem, I have those SCOREs for the following rules: 6D, S17, DOA, DAS, SPA1, SPL3, NS, 4.5/6, and R22 indices:

CAC2

1-12: 23.66
1-16: 27.73

Hi-Opt II

1-12: 21.89
1-16: 25.68

Sincerely,
Cac

Thank you very much ! That is what I am looking for.

[James989]

You're entitled to ask for whatever you want, but realize that the comparison is badly flawed. Hi-Opt II requires a side count of aces because it doesn't count the ace in the primary count. Not keeping the side count cripples the system. CAC2 counts the ace in the primary count and, therefore, doesn't require the side count, which makes it much simpler. But Cac has never made the claim that his count will outperform Hi-Opt II when the latter is used the way it is intended to be used.

Don

Cacaluro's sim results proved that CAC2 is outperform(7.4% higher) Hi Opt II (without ace side count) !