NEW Card Counting System! (CAC2 + CAC2 Enhanced)

[Gronbog]

I think he has me confused with someone at BJA. I neither formally train nor mentor anyone or any team.

I won't be re-engaging on this topic when he returns. My opinion is posted along with his insults. The readers can take what they will from it all.

And apologies to Cacarulo for the hijacking of his thread.

[DSchles]

I think he has me confused with someone at BJA. I neither formally train nor mentor anyone or any team.

I won't be re-engaging on this topic when he returns. My opinion is posted along with his insults. The readers can take what they will from it all.

And apologies to Cacarulo for the hijacking of his thread.

Moral: “It's better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak and to remove all doubt.”

Don

[llock27]

Subject: CAC2 Enhanced Setup Assistance on CVCX AND CVBJ

Dear Admin,
I recently purchased CVBJ, CVCX, CAC2, and CAC2 Enhanced and have begun practicing. I'm encountering difficulties setting up the last three side count methods in CVCX and CVBJ.

Could you please provide detailed instructions on how to properly configure these side counts within CVCX and CVBJ.

Thank you for your time and assistance.

Sincerely!

[Seraph]

You really have to repeatedly wonder why newbies come here, seeking information, and then decide to insult the people who give it to them. Very strange modus operandi.

Don

Don

Strange indeed
Probably some people arent looking for information, and just want validation , thats why they react that way when they dindt find it.
Im not sure tho

[Norm]

The U.S. in general has become nastier over the last few years. Particularly noticeable on Wikipedia. Even on the Flat Earth article, new users are demanding that both the Earth is flat and and the Earth is spherical "theories" be explained with no commentary on which is correct; so that the reader can decide.

[BackCounter]

From what I have seen, even though forums in general tend to be “kook magnets,” blackjack forums (not just this one) are nastier than most. Maybe because there is a “performance” aspect to the game that gets people’s pride involved, the James Bond image that some people have of themselves. Or the “underworld” associations that casinos have which attract certain people.

[ShipTheCookies]

Seems that members that put "god" or "king" in their user names have rotten attitudes.

[Cacarulo]

Subject: CAC2 Enhanced Setup Assistance on CVCX AND CVBJ

Dear Admin,
I recently purchased CVBJ, CVCX, CAC2, and CAC2 Enhanced and have begun practicing. I'm encountering difficulties setting up the last three side count methods in CVCX and CVBJ.

Could you please provide detailed instructions on how to properly configure these side counts within CVCX and CVBJ.

Thank you for your time and assistance.

Sincerely!

It has already been replied to by email.

Sincerely,
Cac

[Cacarulo]

And apologies to Cacarulo for the hijacking of his thread.

No problem.

Sincerely,
Cac

[Timsanders]

This sounds very interesting. I think it's time to try something new and stop using Hi-Opt I.

Tim

[Quantumheist]

Hi all, I was reading through the docs and noticed there was no deviation for 15vA, 15v8, A6v2, A5v3, 9sv7, 7sv8, 3sv8, 2sv8, 4sv4. Anyone know why that might be?

I can see why the pairs might be skipped as they are a pretty unique hand, so you wont be using that deviation much. But the 2 15 hands seem pretty common so I'm surprised they aren't on there.

[Cacarulo]

This sounds very interesting. I think it's time to try something new and stop using Hi-Opt I.

Tim

Hi Tim,

I missed replying to this post earlier. The issue with Hi-Opt I is that it depends heavily on other side counts.
For example, in 6D with a 1-16 spread, Hi-Opt I has a SCORE of 21.41. It's only playable with an ace side count,
where it reaches a SCORE of 25.39. In comparison, CAC2, using the same spread, achieves
a SCORE of 27.73 without the need for any secondary counts.

Hope this helps.

Sincerely,
Cac