ENHC surrender 88 vs 10 or A

[Ole]

So for ENHC HiLo, this should be copied from HiLo, with any doubles or splits vs 10 or A removed ...

As Norm said, that may be information from "Rather old books" ... so one should update ones strategy. Therefore, once again referring to the newest book
"The Hi-Lo Card Counting System: A Complete Guide to Index Play,"
there actually appears to be a couple indexes that DO relate to either doubling or splitting against a Ten,
but of course not against an Ace.

Sent from my LM-K500 using Tapatalk

[Ole]

Thanks. Quite difficult to get Don's books in the UK. I am still trying to get BJA3.

Try going direct to the Huntington Press website, they carry both. My copy came within a week (here in the US).
Best of luck.
Ole

Sent from my LM-K500 using Tapatalk

[Jamie]

I have created a new strategy in CV for ENHC surrender pairs: The changes to the existing SWong HiLo for ENHC MultiDeck charts are as follows:
88 vs 10 treated as 16 vs 10. i.e. will surrender vs 10 if available
77 vs 10 treated as 14 vs 10 i.e. will surrender vs 10 on a TC >=3 if available when using the F4

The rest of the ENHC rules were correct.

However, when saving and selecting the strategy with ENHC selected, the overrides don't show. 88 vs 10 is still showing as hit. I have attached the screenshots.

overrides.jpg
incorrect surrender for pairs.jpg

[Jamie]

Try going direct to the Huntington Press website, they carry both. My copy came within a week (here in the US).

They don't have a UK distributor, and charge almost as much as the book for delivery to the UK. I have tried some large London bookstores including Foyles and they don't hold it.

[DSchles]

Thanks. Quite difficult to get Don's books in the UK. I am still trying to get BJA3. Hopefully BJA and the new book will be available on kindle at some point.

The new book is now available on Kindle!

Don

[DSchles]

77 vs 10 treated as 14 vs 10 i.e. will surrender vs 10 on a TC >=3 if available

The 7,7 surrender index is +2, not +3.

Don

[Jamie]

Thanks. Just bought it. Any plans for bja3 on the Kindle?

[Jamie]

The 7,7 surrender index is +2, not +3

Thanks. Could you explain why this differs from any other 14. I understand for single deck due to effect of removal but am struggling to wrap my head around the difference for multi deck.

[DSchles]

Thanks. Could you explain why this differs from any other 14. I understand for single deck due to effect of removal but am struggling to wrap my head around the difference for multi deck.

Same reason. Can't always apply logic to every play. The graph for ordinary 14 vs. T barely shows an edge at +3. The graph for 7,7 vs. T barely shows an edge at +2. So, while it hardly matters what you do when the plays are that close, they are what they are.

Don

[Jamie]

Thanks, understood.