Question for Norm: Hi-Lo vs KO

[Norm]

With KO, there is a wide range of counts over which to vary the bet so there is a gradual progression in the bet variation. With Hi-Lo, for any reasonable bet spread, the bet only varies over a brief range of TC. I wonder if the TC conversion is more forgiving of counting errors than simply tracking the RC with an unbalanced system.

There are counters who bet by half TCs to widen the range. This is supported by CVCX/CVData.

Not much help with HiLo: https://www.blackjackincolor.com/penetration12.htm

[MJ1]

I have a much better idea, and I'm not being sarcastic. Instead of spending so much time trying to figure out how much errors cost, why not spend the same amount of time practicing enough so that you don't make any errors at all?

Errors are part of the game. We are mere mortals, not machines. Mistakes are going to happen, like it or not. The MIT Teams estimated that they lost 0.25% of EV for various reasons, including errors. They calculated their bet taking this error into account.

I agree with the spirit of your post; namely to practice and play as strong a game as you possibly can.

MJ