Originally Posted by
Zenfighter
Secretariat wrote:
It's been beaten by 6% at 6D and probaly by more at DD. Pennies or dollars? I take +6% any time but I realize it could be 3%, 2%, 1%. I don't know yet.
News for me. I think the last time I heard about such extraordinary figures was in the late 90s, with me looking closely at the BJ´s scene and totally surprised about the claims of “The Three Horsemen” of the Non-Random theories, namely Patterson, Olsen and Clifton Davies. They were more modest in their claims, btw. Around a 4% only, IIRC.
But the times they are a changin´, for what I have seen in this thread. This guy who goes by the handle of Dylan, has always been plain right.
Another possibility, with a certain degree of a valid assumption on my part, is that you´re suffering the deceptive effects of this inseparable friend of us, called Standard Deviation, due to a meager collected sampling, and consequently, overly evaluating all this, far beyond the inherent merits of the system.
Sncerely,
Zenfighter
Bookmarks