Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: Are these deviations correct for H17, DAS, A's (only one card after split). 6 Deck

  1. #1


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Are these deviations correct for H17, DAS, A's (only one card after split). 6 Deck

    I've used the illustrious 18 as well as Stanford Wongs charts. This is for 6 Deck, H17, DAS except A's only one card, No Surrender, Double Any two cards.

    Insurance - always take insurance TC=> 3

    16 vs A stand TC=> 3
    16 vs 10 stand TC=> 0
    16 vs 9 stand TC=> 5
    15 vs 10 stand TC=> 4
    15 vs A stand TC=>5
    13 vs 2 hit if TC=< -1
    13 vs 3 hit if TC=< -2
    12 vs 2 stand if TC=> 3
    12 vs 3 stand if TC=> 2
    12 vs 4 hits if TC=<0
    12 vs 5 hits if TC=< -2
    12 vs 6 hits if TC=< -3
    11 vs A Double if TC=> -1
    10 vs 10 Double TC=> 4
    10 vs A Double TC=> 3
    9 vs 2 Double if TC=> 1
    9 vs 7 Double if TC=> 3
    8 Double vs 6 TC=> 2

    Split 10’s vs 4 TC=> 6
    Split 10’s vs 5 TC=> 5
    Split 10’s vs 6 TC=> 4
    A,8 doubles vs 4 TC=>3
    A,8 doubles vs 5 TC=>1
    A,8 doubles vs 6 TC=>0
    A,6 doubles vs 2 TC=>1

  2. #2
    Senior Member Gramazeka's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Ukraine
    Posts
    1,305


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Buy CV Data

    qfit.com
    "Don't Cast Your Pearls Before Swine" (Jesus)

  3. #3


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    I have already bought CVCX "Chapter X It" and Casino Verite. I also have Stanford Wong "Professional Black Jack", as well as Don Schlesingers Black Jack Attack. I was just looking for confirmation to confirm my understanding is correct. What are the benefits of CV Data, I haven't really researched it to fully understand what it is capable of?

  4. #4


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by bsdavidson21 View Post
    I've used the illustrious 18 as well as Stanford Wongs charts. This is for 6 Deck, H17, DAS except A's only one card, No Surrender, Double Any two cards.

    Insurance - always take insurance TC=> 3

    16 vs A stand TC=> 3
    16 vs 10 stand TC=> 0
    16 vs 9 stand TC=> 5
    15 vs 10 stand TC=> 4
    15 vs A stand TC=>5
    13 vs 2 hit if TC=< -1
    13 vs 3 hit if TC=< -2
    12 vs 2 stand if TC=> 3
    12 vs 3 stand if TC=> 2
    12 vs 4 hits if TC=<0
    12 vs 5 hits if TC=< -2
    12 vs 6 hits if TC=< -3
    11 vs A Double if TC=> -1
    10 vs 10 Double TC=> 4
    10 vs A Double TC=> 3
    9 vs 2 Double if TC=> 1
    9 vs 7 Double if TC=> 3
    8 Double vs 6 TC=> 2

    Split 10’s vs 4 TC=> 6
    Split 10’s vs 5 TC=> 5
    Split 10’s vs 6 TC=> 4
    A,8 doubles vs 4 TC=>3
    A,8 doubles vs 5 TC=>1
    A,8 doubles vs 6 TC=>0
    A,6 doubles vs 2 TC=>1
    The indices are correct. Depending on the way you solve the remaining decks, some of the indices may vary at some point, but nothing important. The ideal is that, as Grama says, you should use CVDATA but not to obtain EM-indices but rather RA-indices.

    Sincerely,
    Cac

  5. #5


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by Cacarulo View Post
    The indices are correct.
    Well, yes, but the => interpretation for all the 12s and 13s isn't. Indices are for standing, not hitting. So, to give a single example, for 12 vs. 4, we STAND if the index is >= 0. We do not HIT is the index is <= 0.

    Don

  6. #6


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by DSchles View Post
    Well, yes, but the => interpretation for all the 12s and 13s isn't. Indices are for standing, not hitting. So, to give a single example, for 12 vs. 4, we STAND if the index is >= 0. We do not HIT is the index is <= 0.

    Don
    Good catch! I missed the directions of the inequalities.

    Cac

  7. #7


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Thanks for the correction @DSchles! Also, I'd like to personally thank you for the time, work, and, dedication you've put into this profession helping out folks like me. Greatly appreciated!

  8. #8


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Thank you, the assistance is greatly appreciated @Cacarulo

  9. #9


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by bsdavidson21 View Post
    Thank you, the assistance is greatly appreciated @Cacarulo
    You're welcome.

    Cac

Similar Threads

  1. European - No Hole Card Game, Deviations, Card counting
    By Rebeka 115 in forum General Blackjack Forum
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 09-18-2020, 01:40 AM
  2. Double Deck Deviations
    By Battousai in forum General Blackjack Forum
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 09-28-2018, 09:06 PM
  3. H17 Deviations Correct? Expert OpinionS
    By Dtb239 in forum General Blackjack Forum
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 09-13-2013, 10:38 AM
  4. Myooligan: "correct" card counting technique
    By Myooligan in forum Blackjack Beginners
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 07-18-2005, 05:11 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

About Blackjack: The Forum

BJTF is an advantage player site based on the principles of comity. That is, civil and considerate behavior for the mutual benefit of all involved. The goal of advantage play is the legal extraction of funds from gaming establishments by gaining a mathematic advantage and developing the skills required to use that advantage. To maximize our success, it is important to understand that we are all on the same side. Personal conflicts simply get in the way of our goals.