Hi to all,

This post is a continuation of a previous thread where I tried to explain how to take advantage of C-D indices
and where the result was not what I expected. That's why I took a little more time to analyze it.
After reviewing again the subject of what I have now baptized as "dynamic insurance" I've come to the conclusion that there was no error in the theory.
It only had to be modified a little and thanks to several simulations I realized what was happening.
It's basically a new concept on how to maintain a side count of aces but with minimal mental effort.
In the dynamic insurance method there is no need to adjust the RC for excess or deficiency of aces as in the old-fashioned method.
In fact the RC is never adjusted according to the aces that have come out.
The aces that come out are simply counted and depending on the amount that have come out, the index is adjusted according to a table.
For a better understanding I will explain it with some examples for Hi-Lo:

Single deck
Generic index: +2

Dynamic index:
2 or more aces came up: +1
3 or more aces came up: -3

Double deck
Generic index: +2

Dynamic index:
4 or more aces came up: +1
6 or more aces came up: 0/-1
7 or more aces came up: -2/-3

Six decks
Generic index: +3

Dynamic index:
12 or more aces came up: +2
17 or more aces came up: +1
19 or more aces came up: 0

Note that you do not need to know the entire table. One can cut it anywhere.
For example in DD if I saw four aces out I can now modify my index to +1 and continue with that index until the end.
This is always going to be better than continuing with the generic index.
That's all.

Enjoy!

Sincerely,
Cac