See the top rated post in this thread. Click here

Page 1 of 6 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 57

Thread: For Gramazeka (HO2, AO2, BRH-0, EBJ2)

  1. #1


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Wink For Gramazeka (HO2, AO2, BRH-0, EBJ2)

    I do not want to open a separate topic, for this I will ask my questions here for Kakarulo. I'm interested in comparing several systems at different spreads. Let it be 6 decks, pen 4/ 6 , spread 1-20 and 1-50.

    1. AO 2 vs Hi Opt 2.
    2. EBJ 2 vs BRH 0.

    My academic interest is this - at what spread would AO 2 outperform Hi Opt 2 due to its more powerful BC? And due to what BRH 0 outperforms EBJ 2?

    https://www.blackjackinfo.com/commun...r-6deck.12920/

    See post by BRH

    He put BRH 0 higher than RPC.
    Code:
    Here are the answers to your questions: Sims conditions: 6D-S17-DOA-DAS-SPA1-SPL3-NS, 4.5/6, R22 plays, 50 billion rounds each, play-all, heads-up. 1) 1-12 1-16 1-30 1-40 Hi-Opt II/A 25.53 29.74 36.91 39.34 Omega II/A 24.67 28.80 35.84 38.23 Hi-Opt II 21.89 25.68 32.15 34.33 Omega II 21.11 24.82 31.16 33.29 2) 1-12 1-16 1-30 1-40 BRH-0 22.77 26.79 33.71 36.07 EBJ-2 22.53 26.50 33.35 35.69
    The problem with EBJ-2 is that it counts the nine. While this improves BC, on the other hand it decreases IC and PC/PE.
    BRH-0 BC = 0.9799 IC = 0.7852 PC = 0.7774 EBJ-2 BC = 0.9854 IC = 0.7462 PC = 0.7713 About BRH systems BRH-0 is actually Red-7 or Double Red-7 and can be played in both RC and TC modes. In fact if you look at my CAC/71 system you will see that by doing (2*pc+sc) I am using DR7 in TC mode but ONLY for betting. In EBJ-2 the idea was to increase BC by counting nines, but as I said before, this decreases IC and PC/PE. BRH-I is HALVES but not counting nines. The same problem occurs here as with BRH-0 and EBJ-2 and that is why BRH-I outperforms HALVES. BRH-II is ZEN with an side count of aces. Enjoy! Sincerely, Cac

    Last edited by Cacarulo; 05-11-2022 at 02:43 PM.

  2. #2
    Senior Member Gramazeka's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Ukraine
    Posts
    1,131


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    It turns out that a properly configured Red Seven system beats RPC? ))

    UBZ beats Halves? See post by BRH-

    “True
    ------
    Brh-1
    UBZ11(unb)
    Wong Halves
    Zen
    Brh-0(unb)
    RPC
    K-O(true)
    Red-7(true)[Brh-0-lite]
    Hi-Lo“
    Last edited by Gramazeka; 05-12-2022 at 04:55 PM.
    "Don't Cast Your Pearls Before Swine" (Jesus)

  3. #3
    Random number herder Norm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    The mote in God's eye
    Posts
    12,035
    Blog Entries
    59


    1 out of 1 members found this post helpful. Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Umm, I know Brett and have difficulty with this. Of course, depending on the many variables, many things are possible.
    "I don't think outside the box; I think of what I can do with the box." - Henri Matisse

  4. #4


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by Gramazeka View Post
    It turns out that a properly configured Red Seven system beats RPC? ))

    UBZ beats Halves? See post by BRH-

    “True
    ------
    Brh-1
    UBZ11(unb)
    Wong Halves
    Zen
    Brh-0(unb)
    RPC
    K-O(true)
    Red-7(true)[Brh-0-lite]
    Hi-Lo“
    Sorry, I forgot to add RPC!! I already added it in this edition.

    Under the same conditions that I used in my previous comparisons (6D,S17,DOA,DAS,SPA1,SPL3,NS,4.5/6,R22), I would say NO.

    My order is as follows:

    BRH-I (TC)
    HALVES (TC)
    ZEN (TC)
    UBZ2 (TC)
    RPC (TC)
    DR7/BRH-0 (TC)
    UBZ2 (RC)
    EBJ-2 (TC)
    TKO (TC)
    DR7/BRH-0 (RC)
    KO (RC)
    HI-LO (TC)

    Sincerely,
    Cac
    Last edited by Cacarulo; 05-13-2022 at 08:44 AM.

  5. #5


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by Cacarulo View Post
    Sorry, I forgot to add RPC!! I already added it in this edition.

    Under the same conditions that I used in my previous comparisons (6D,S17,DOA,DAS,SPA1,SPL3,NS,4.5/6,R22), I would say NO.

    My order is as follows:

    BRH-I (TC)
    HALVES (TC)
    ZEN (TC)
    UBZ2 (TC)
    RPC (TC)
    DR7/BRH-0 (TC)
    UBZ2 (RC)
    EBJ-2 (TC)
    TKO (TC)
    DR7/BRH-0 (RC)
    KO (RC)
    HI-LO (TC)

    Sincerely,
    Cac
    RPC added!

  6. #6
    Senior Member Gramazeka's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Ukraine
    Posts
    1,131


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    What software are you using? SBA ?
    "Don't Cast Your Pearls Before Swine" (Jesus)

  7. #7


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by Gramazeka View Post
    What software are you using? SBA ?
    I'm using my software.
    Apparently you don't like my ranking very much, do you?
    If you are not convinced you can use CVDATA/CVCX. You simply generate a set of 22 indexes (R22 = Catch-22 but changing 10vT to TTv4) and then run 50 billion rounds for each simulation.
    You can also use SBA.

    Sincerely,
    Cac

  8. #8
    Senior Member Gramazeka's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Ukraine
    Posts
    1,131


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    In order for the BC parameter to work well, we must fine-tune the deck divider and calibrate the bets according to our advantage. What deck divider do you use in simulations?
    Last edited by Gramazeka; 05-13-2022 at 03:07 PM.
    "Don't Cast Your Pearls Before Swine" (Jesus)

  9. #9


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by Gramazeka View Post
    In order for the BC parameter to work well, we must fine-tune the deck divider and calibrate the bets according to our advantage. What deck divider do you use in simulations?
    In these cases I used floored indices with exact decks remaining and the SCOREs were calculated using optimal bettings.

    Cac

  10. #10
    Senior Member Gramazeka's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Ukraine
    Posts
    1,131


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    I understand that you have exact cards as a divisor? Or like a quarter of a deck? Half deck? For example, where HO 2 will bet 10 units, then AO 2 will bet 11 units at the same time, according to the dictated advantage.
    Last edited by Gramazeka; 05-13-2022 at 03:36 PM.
    "Don't Cast Your Pearls Before Swine" (Jesus)

Page 1 of 6 123 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Gramazeka
    By bjarg in forum General Blackjack Forum
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 05-12-2014, 08:06 AM
  2. Gramazeka: Robbery EPT !!!
    By Gramazeka in forum Blackjack Main
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 03-08-2010, 07:50 AM
  3. Replies: 4
    Last Post: 09-14-2009, 04:20 AM
  4. Gramazeka: EBJ 2
    By Gramazeka in forum Blackjack Main
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 06-14-2009, 10:03 AM
  5. Gramazeka: Split 2,2 and 3,3 vs 8
    By Gramazeka in forum Blackjack Main
    Replies: 34
    Last Post: 03-03-2007, 03:41 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

About Blackjack: The Forum

BJTF is an advantage player site based on the principles of comity. That is, civil and considerate behavior for the mutual benefit of all involved. The goal of advantage play is the legal extraction of funds from gaming establishments by gaining a mathematic advantage and developing the skills required to use that advantage. To maximize our success, it is important to understand that we are all on the same side. Personal conflicts simply get in the way of our goals.