https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mbOhuUBAv_0
The series will document the complete path from someone who has never played BJ before, to becoming an AP and touring the US and Europe.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mbOhuUBAv_0
The series will document the complete path from someone who has never played BJ before, to becoming an AP and touring the US and Europe.
This guy (team) is playing to a $420,000 BR. At 4:00 he says his lowest bet will be 2 hands @ $200 and his highest bet 2 hands @ $1500 (but more often 2 hands @ $1200.) That's a 1 to 7.5 spread, correct? If they're not wongin in isn't this spread insufficient?
Also, after watching the rest of the video, they seem to get backed off A LOT. Is playing to that large of a bankroll suicide?
https://youtu.be/DHyWeSOEgd4
Depending on rules and with good cut - more than sufficient. Especially so with certain regaled systems.This guy (team) is playing to a $420,000 BR. At 4:00 he says his lowest bet will be 2 hands @ $200 and his highest bet 2 hands @ $1500 (but more often 2 hands @ $1200.) That's a 1 to 7.5 spread, correct? If they're not wongin in isn't this spread insufficient?
The house doesn’t necessarily know your bankroll. However, most places won’t tolerate for long, if at all. However, longevity is there if the house perceives you as an idiot or weak. Certain regaled systems will assist in that regard.Also, after watching the rest of the video, they seem to get backed off A LOT. Is playing to that large of a bankroll suicide?
As a further comment, a team with a heavy duty bankroll should be professionally managed. I don’t think this one was. There is a strong issue of trust that must be present and with managed controls. As Ronald Reagan said - Trust but verify.Originally Posted by Freightman
Further, SOP should have a firmly understood and agreed to playing and ramping system in order to properly review player performance. Teams are fine for some - For myself, a team approach is if no interest. I prefer the lone wolf approach - to play at my leisure and in a manner that I prefer.
I watched a few of these video clips including the $3000 card counting bootcamp one. This guy Steven Bridges was a young entertainer learning to count and this was his first ever trip to Las Vegas. Also, it seems the bootcamp is fun. I'd like to pay $3000 to become an apprentice.
This Steven bridges made quite a hype. A very attractive English brit entering the very sexy game of blackjack. I wonder if he knows about me. The dalmatian road warrior tale would go hand in hand with the Steven bridges magical fairy run
The Magical Mystery Tour is of far greater interest. Besides, your love interest was not seasoned or nuanced, simply robotic. Oh wait….The dalmatian road warrior tale would go hand in hand with the Steven bridges magical fairy run
https://youtu.be/l8WMGBuNaus
I revisited these bootcamp videos and fount some of these videos were recorded in 2018. One of the apprentices said in the video that as a team, their biggest blackjack win was in an European casino with 2:1 blackjack. However, they also said that card counting conditions in USA are 100 times better than in Europe. They sound honest.
I'm guessing he didn't mean Vegas when he said that conditions are much better in the U.S. It's getting tough to find 3:2 blackjack at all on the strip, much less something like 2:1. A friend of mine went through Resorts World a couple months back and said there were 44 BJ tables open, and only 4 of them were dealing 3:2. That used to be the saving grace of Vegas, that table hopping was so easy in those massive casinos. Not anymore.
"Depending on rules and with good cut - more than sufficient. Especially so with certain regaled systems."
I'm pretty rusty and was never great with CVCX but I'm seeing a SCORE of roughly 21, which is pretty shitty if I remember, no (6D, 80% pen, H17, LS, DAS, RA,)? Also a SD of $10,906 per HR and a NO of 47,170. Would these be acceptable numbers to most pros?
What's a regaled system?
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks