See the top rated post in this thread. Click here

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 14 to 26 of 39

Thread: card counting DVD for training

  1. #14


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by aceside View Post
    You must be very advanced because I have never met anybody here using a level three counting system.
    Bovine excrement

    Oh! I’m not responding to your friendship request.

  2. #15
    Banned or Suspended
    Join Date
    Oct 2018
    Posts
    1,154


    0 out of 1 members found this post helpful. Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by Freightman View Post
    Bovine excrement

    Oh! I’m not responding to your friendship request.
    Thank you for your response. I am doing some internet research. You guys are great!

  3. #16


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by Freightman View Post
    More bovine excrement
    Really!!!! Your Wong Halves can't even beat UBZII using only the running count in double deck games without incorporating ace side count to Wong Halves. So, why don't you be quiet.

    Your Wong Halves is not shit without an ace side count. All I have to do is go in CVDATA generate 100+ risk adverse indices using UBZII in running count. Playing a double deck game. I am willing to bet UBZII in running count will beat Wong Halves with true count.
    Last edited by seriousplayer; 02-11-2021 at 01:29 PM.

  4. #17


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by seriousplayer View Post
    Really!!!! Your Wong Halves can't even beat UBZII using only the running count in double deck games without incorporating ace side count to Wong Halves. So, why don't you be quiet.
    1. You’ve totally missed the point - not unusual on this site
    2. Learns to absorb and then decipher information
    3. Don’t know UBZ2, so don’t give a shit
    4. Try FBM ASC Advanced - WH on steroids
    5. Reread point 2, then maybe, you’ll get point 1
    6. Think I’ll go back into hibernation

  5. #18


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Try Wong Halves without FBM ASC Advance:
    Your Wong Halves is no shit without an ace side count. All I have to do is go in CVDATA generate 100+ risk adverse indices using UBZII in running count. Playing a double deck game. I am willing to bet UBZII in running count will beat Wong Halves with true count.

  6. #19


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by seriousplayer View Post
    Try Wong Halves without FBM ASC Advance:
    Your Wong Halves is no shit without an ace side count. All I have to do is go in CVDATA generate 100+ risk adverse indices using UBZII in running count. Playing a double deck game. I am willing to bet UBZII in running count will beat Wong Halves with true count.
    And how much more would you be making each hour using one instead of the other? 2 cents?

  7. #20
    Random number herder Norm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    The mote in God's eye
    Posts
    12,461
    Blog Entries
    59


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    I assume the point is that UBZ11 is easier.
    "I don't think outside the box; I think of what I can do with the box." - Henri Matisse

  8. #21


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by Norm View Post
    I assume the point is that UBZ11 is easier.
    My point is that if Wong Halves is so strong why would a level 2 count beat it in double deck game and a side count is needed to improve the performance? Wong Halve should beat UBZII in all conditions without adding another parameter. In my opinion, if someone needs to add a side count to another count to beat the other means to me that count is inferior.

  9. #22


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by ZeeBabar View Post
    And how much more would you be making each hour using one instead of the other? 2 cents?
    I’ll come out of self imposed hibernation one more time to explain to Junior the flaws in his minor league argument.

    He states and implies - only UBZ2 100 RA indices are required to beat Halves at double deck. Congratulations. My main game is 6 deck which I’m sure all are aware is far more dependent on Betting Correlation. Further, add on FBM Basic, really nothing more than an ASC, which is not required to surpass UBZ 2 at 6 deck, and the tide turns at DD.

    Now, add on the fearsome power of FBM ASC Advanced and you have a fearsome counting weapon for any game. Some time back, I laid the gauntlet down about determining the underlying theory behind FBM ASC Advanced. No one has yet taken up the challenge.

  10. #23


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by Freightman View Post
    Bovine excrement
    Might you have meant equine excrement?!

    Don

  11. #24


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by Freightman View Post
    I’ll come out of self imposed hibernation one more time to explain to Junior the flaws in his minor league argument.

    He states and implies - only UBZ2 100 RA indices are required to beat Halves at double deck. Congratulations. My main game is 6 deck which I’m sure all are aware is far more dependent on Betting Correlation. Further, add on FBM Basic, really nothing more than an ASC, which is not required to surpass UBZ 2 at 6 deck, and the tide turns at DD.

    Now, add on the fearsome power of FBM ASC Advanced and you have a fearsome counting weapon for any game. Some time back, I laid the gauntlet down about determining the underlying theory behind FBM ASC Advanced. No one has yet taken up the challenge.
    Yes, because full Wong Halves consist of 100+ indices. So it is an apple to apple comparison. Secondly, for an unbalanced count like UBZII it doesn't have 100+ in six or eight deck games. It will have less indices. I selected every indices in CVDATA to try to generate the indices using UBZII in a six deck and it only came up with more than 60+. In an eight deck game the indices are even less.

    In the same sense I can add a secondary count to match your FBM ASC Advanced Wong Halves.
    Last edited by seriousplayer; 02-11-2021 at 06:20 PM.

  12. #25


    0 out of 1 members found this post helpful. Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by DSchles View Post
    Might you have meant equine excrement?!

    Don
    I’m really trying to hibernate, however, your inquiry requires explanation. I was referring to bullshit versus horse shit. To save another post, I must confess that I’m pissed at Norm. I was drinking hot tea when I clicked on the ballchinian link - said tea scalding my nostrils.

  13. #26


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by seriousplayer View Post
    Yes, because full Wong Halves consist of 100+ indices. So it is an apple to apple comparison. Secondly, for an unbalanced count like UBZII it doesn't have 100+ in six or eight deck games. It will have less indices. I selected every indices in CVDATA to try to generate the indices using UBZII in a six deck and it only came up with more than 60+. In an eight deck game the indices are even less.
    How exciting! You should quit while you’re behind.

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. European - No Hole Card Game, Deviations, Card counting
    By Rebeka 115 in forum General Blackjack Forum
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 09-18-2020, 12:40 AM
  2. Hole Card AP Training
    By Stealth in forum General Blackjack Forum
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 10-19-2019, 11:31 AM
  3. Where i can do Card counting training
    By abukase2 in forum General Blackjack Forum
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 05-08-2017, 07:56 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

About Blackjack: The Forum

BJTF is an advantage player site based on the principles of comity. That is, civil and considerate behavior for the mutual benefit of all involved. The goal of advantage play is the legal extraction of funds from gaming establishments by gaining a mathematic advantage and developing the skills required to use that advantage. To maximize our success, it is important to understand that we are all on the same side. Personal conflicts simply get in the way of our goals.