Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 14 to 26 of 60

Thread: Wong Halves System Complete Index

  1. #14


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by Gramazeka View Post
    Yes
    Thanks for your clarifications.

    Can you send me the complete index for HARD HIT/STAND, SOFT HIT/STAND, HARD DOUBLE DOWN, SOFT DOUBLE DOWN and SPLIT.

    The BJ rules : 8D, S17, DAS, ENHC, ES10, DAS, DO2, RS2, RSA2, BJ pay 3 to 2

    You can post it here or send it to : [email protected]

  2. #15
    Senior Member Gramazeka's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Ukraine
    Posts
    1,438


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Ok, BJtraveller asked to help you.Check your mail.
    Last edited by Gramazeka; 12-05-2019 at 07:18 PM.
    "Don't Cast Your Pearls Before Swine" (Jesus)

  3. #16


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by Gramazeka View Post
    Ok, BJtraveller asked to help you.
    Thank you(and BJtraveller) !

  4. #17


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by Gramazeka View Post
    Ok, BJtraveller asked to help you.Check your mail.
    Your Wong halves SPLIT index for 44 vs 4, 44 vs 5 and 44 vs 6 is 6.4, -1.6 and -6.2 respectively, after divided by 2, it become 3.2, -0.8, and -3.1.


    However, the indices for those hands are 1, -2 and -5 respectively as shown in Professional Blackajack(page 283), which is quite different compare to yours.


    Could you please double check it ?

  5. #18


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Couldn’t you have just used the 4D indices written in Professional Blackjack for 8D? I’ve been using the same indices (Zen count) for 2D, 6D, 8D.

  6. #19
    Senior Member Gramazeka's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Ukraine
    Posts
    1,438


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Stanford Wong used old software. My indeces is perfect. 6 d indeces = 8 d indeces.
    "Don't Cast Your Pearls Before Swine" (Jesus)

  7. #20


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by Gramazeka View Post
    Stanford Wong used old software. My indeces is perfect. 6 d indeces = 8 d indeces.
    Tq

  8. #21
    Random number herder Norm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    The mote in God's eye
    Posts
    12,461
    Blog Entries
    59


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by Gramazeka View Post
    Stanford Wong used old software. My indeces is perfect. 6 d indeces = 8 d indeces.
    Well, if your 6D indices = 8D indices, clearly they aren't "perfect". Albeit, there is little difference.
    "I don't think outside the box; I think of what I can do with the box." - Henri Matisse

  9. #22


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by Norm View Post
    Well, if your 6D indices = 8D indices, clearly they aren't "perfect". Albeit, there is little difference.
    Norm, your CVDATA 8D indices for those three hands(44 vs 4, 44 vs 5 and 44 vs 6) is 1, -3, and -6, any comments ?

  10. #23
    Random number herder Norm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    The mote in God's eye
    Posts
    12,461
    Blog Entries
    59


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    I'm severely time pressed at the moment.
    "I don't think outside the box; I think of what I can do with the box." - Henri Matisse

  11. #24


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by James989 View Post
    Your Wong halves SPLIT index for 44 vs 4, 44 vs 5 and 44 vs 6 is 6.4, -1.6 and -6.2 respectively, after divided by 2, it become 3.2, -0.8, and -3.1.


    However, the indices for those hands are 1, -2 and -5 respectively as shown in Professional Blackajack(page 283), which is quite different compare to yours.


    Could you please double check it ?
    James989, In Wong's copyright reprinting years of Professional Blackjack specifically 1994 had multiple repressing dates according to an older post from Don S. There were a few errors that slipped through in some of those various printing dates. I also have one copy with a few errors.
    4 4 versus a 4 up with double after a split should be +3.
    Last edited by BoSox; 12-10-2019 at 04:04 PM.

  12. #25


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by Gramazeka View Post
    Stanford Wong used old software. My indeces is perfect. 6 d indeces = 8 d indeces.
    What about you holding 8,7 versus a ten up card?
    And you holding a 12 consisting of a ten and a deuce versus a 4 up card?

  13. #26
    Senior Member Gramazeka's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Ukraine
    Posts
    1,438


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by Norm View Post
    Well, if your 6D indices = 8D indices, clearly they aren't "perfect". Albeit, there is little difference.
    Very little difference. 0,1 ; 0,2 in some hands. This will not affect the simulation results.
    "Don't Cast Your Pearls Before Swine" (Jesus)

Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Wong halves vs hi lo
    By blueman in forum General Blackjack Forum
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 10-30-2016, 09:40 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

About Blackjack: The Forum

BJTF is an advantage player site based on the principles of comity. That is, civil and considerate behavior for the mutual benefit of all involved. The goal of advantage play is the legal extraction of funds from gaming establishments by gaining a mathematic advantage and developing the skills required to use that advantage. To maximize our success, it is important to understand that we are all on the same side. Personal conflicts simply get in the way of our goals.