Hello,
In Dynamic Blackjack, Richard Reid uses a secondary count for Aces. OK
To improve insurance decision, he suggests to muliply the number of Aces seen by two (EBJ II is a balanced second level count) and add it to the running count before doing the true count conversion. OK
His example seems clear.
But what I don't understand is how he can uses the same index (+6)
As a reminder, you can found that very interesting book for free in subscription forums.
Phoebe
Bookmarks