# Thread: CVDATA - TKO vs Hi-Lo Results

1. Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
Originally Posted by Phoebe
I could understand exactly 100. Not about 100.
I wrote "about" because my IRC varies, depending on number of decks, like in original KO. Didn't want to go into detail but they are all approximately at 80 to 100. As Vancura/Fuchs write, you can fix the pivot point (like they did), fix the IRC (like Dravot), or fix s.th. different. Each has its advantages.

2. Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
The original formula to convert the KO running count to a TKO true count is :
You can only simply it if IRC is like I said : 0 or-4*decks

TKO = (RC-IRC-4*P) / R
RC = Running Count
IRC = Initial Running Count
P = Decks played (seen)
R = Remaining decks (not seen)

http://blackjack.debourgogne.net/ezt...lish/index.htm

3. Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
Originally Posted by Phoebe
The original formula to convert the KO running count to a TKO true count is :
You can only simplify it if IRC is like I said.

http://blackjack.debourgogne.net/ezt...lish/index.htm [/I]
This is true, but since I don't use true counting, my interest was in simplifying KO in a different respect.

4. Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
Originally Posted by Phoebe
Yes. For a true counted KO, you can use any IRC but only 2 are logical : 0 or -4*decks

Page 3 of 3 First 123

#### Posting Permissions

• You may not post new threads
• You may not post replies
• You may not post attachments
• You may not edit your posts
•