Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 13 of 14

Thread: Depth (Cards) MRI in CVData

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Location
    In orbit around Saturn
    Posts
    897


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Depth (Cards) MRI in CVData

    Hello,

    To find optimal ramps in an unbalanced count, for first and second half shoe I set
    depth (Cards) MRI in CVData to 1-156 then 157-312
    and open CVCX from the sims.

    Well, they seem correct to me.

    But, surprising, c-SCORE is huge (45) in the first half and too big (16) in the second half.
    Global is around 10

    I think the c-SCORE with MRI is not significant at all. Norm, do you confirm ?

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Location
    In orbit around Saturn
    Posts
    897


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Simple ramp
    simple.jpg

    Ramps for first and second half.
    first.jpgsecond.jpg

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Location
    In orbit around Saturn
    Posts
    897


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Maybe we should play only the begining of the shoe.

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Location
    In orbit around Saturn
    Posts
    897


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Is my English so poor?

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Location
    In orbit around Saturn
    Posts
    897


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    SCORE (in fact, c-SCORE) given by CVCX with MRI doen't make sense.

    I asked Norm to explain :
    Quote Originally Posted by Phoebe View Post
    I think the c-SCORE with MRI is not significant at all. Norm, do you confirm ?
    Maybe he missed it, or have no time or doen't understand my question.

    No matters.
    Quote Originally Posted by Phoebe View Post
    Maybe we should play only the begining of the shoe.
    was an ironical way to put thread on the top.

    Your answer was correct but off topic.

    So, a second ironical answer from me :-)

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Location
    In orbit around Saturn
    Posts
    897


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    No problem

    I resume: With MRI, CVData and CVCX (launched from CVData) do not compute SCORE in the same way.
    Of course, custom bets in CVCX are the same as Betting strategy in CVData


    Without MRI
    Both are exactly 54,84

    CVCX Complet.jpgCVData Complet.jpg

    With MRI, cards 1-104
    CVData:35,89
    CVCX:43,70

    CVCX Début.jpgCVData Début.jpg

    My first example with an unfavorable game increased the phenomenon.
    Last edited by Phoebe; 10-06-2019 at 05:46 AM.

  7. #7
    Random number herder Norm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    The mote in God's eye
    Posts
    12,461
    Blog Entries
    59


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Ahh. I need to document that. If you use MRI in CVData, it has no way to pass the overall data to CVCX. It passes the MRI data. MRI is used to examine data subsets for research. The subset is passed. Actually, that can be useful. But, I need to add a warning.
    "I don't think outside the box; I think of what I can do with the box." - Henri Matisse

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Location
    In orbit around Saturn
    Posts
    897


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Got it. Thanks !
    More important, is the optimal ramp good ?

  9. #9
    Random number herder Norm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    The mote in God's eye
    Posts
    12,461
    Blog Entries
    59


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    It would be calculated as if only the MRI hands were played.
    "I don't think outside the box; I think of what I can do with the box." - Henri Matisse

  10. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Location
    In orbit around Saturn
    Posts
    897


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    I am a bit confuse.
    To be clear, does it mean that playing each ramp in each corresponding part of the shoe is the best way to optimize global SCORE ?

  11. #11
    Random number herder Norm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    The mote in God's eye
    Posts
    12,461
    Blog Entries
    59


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Well, while that's true, I don't advise people to play that way.
    "I don't think outside the box; I think of what I can do with the box." - Henri Matisse

  12. #12
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Location
    In orbit around Saturn
    Posts
    897


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    For information, on the tests that I did, the EV increases, which is logical, but the c-SCORE decreases.
    I do not go into the details of my test protocol unless it really interests someone.

  13. #13
    Random number herder Norm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    The mote in God's eye
    Posts
    12,461
    Blog Entries
    59


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    It is possible to increase the SCORE with this scenario; but very difficult as you must optimize all of the different ramps as a whole, not separately. I did design a method of doing this in CVCX; but haven't got 'round to implementing it. Basically, it is optimizing for floating advantage.
    "I don't think outside the box; I think of what I can do with the box." - Henri Matisse

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. CVDAta - Data - MRI - Depth (cards) MRI
    By Phoebe in forum Software
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 06-30-2018, 11:13 PM
  2. Wonging By Depth Confusion CVData
    By MercySakesAlive in forum Software
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 11-29-2017, 09:19 AM
  3. CVData Wonging by Depth
    By MercySakesAlive in forum Software
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 11-19-2017, 09:14 AM
  4. CVData: Tools/MultiSim/MRI Depth Count
    By Phoebe in forum Software
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 01-28-2017, 10:48 AM
  5. CVdata: EV and STD at specified depth
    By Charlie Mosby in forum General Blackjack Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 01-11-2013, 04:03 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

About Blackjack: The Forum

BJTF is an advantage player site based on the principles of comity. That is, civil and considerate behavior for the mutual benefit of all involved. The goal of advantage play is the legal extraction of funds from gaming establishments by gaining a mathematic advantage and developing the skills required to use that advantage. To maximize our success, it is important to understand that we are all on the same side. Personal conflicts simply get in the way of our goals.