Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: Probability question

  1. #1


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Probability question

    Hey guys, I have a probability puzzle I'm really struggling to work out and was hoping someone here could help.

    Two players roll one die each. Player 1 gets to add 2 to whatever number he rolls. High roll wins, and ties are re-rolled. What is the % probability that player 1 will win?

  2. #2


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    When he rolls A 6, he will win 6 of 6
    When he rolls a 5, he will also win 6 of 6
    When he rolls a 4, he will win 5 of 6 and tie 1
    When he rolls a 3, he will win 4 of 6, tie 1 of 6 and lose 1
    When he rolls a 2, he will win 3 of 6, tie 1 of 6, and lose 2 of 6
    When he rolls 1, he will win 2 of 6, tie 1 of 6, lose 3 of 6

    The sum of his wins are 26
    The sum of his ties are 4
    The sum of his losses are 6

    The probability of his winning any particular toss is is 26 of 36 is 13 of 18
    The probability of his winning any subsequent toss after a tie, is still 13 if 18, however, his overall win odds will change slightly for each and every subsequent toss after an initial tie, and ties thereafter.
    Last edited by Freightman; 09-02-2019 at 01:30 PM.

  3. #3


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by Freightman View Post
    When he rolls A 6, he will win 6 of 6
    When he rolls a 5, he will also win 6 of 6
    When he rolls a 4, he will win 5 of 6 and tie 1
    When he rolls a 3, he will win 4 of 6, tie 1 of 6 and lose 1
    When he rolls a 2, he will win 3 of 6, tie 1 of 6, and lose 2 of 6
    When he rolls 1, he will win 2 of 6, tie 1 of 6, lose 3 of 6

    The sum of his wins are 26
    The sum of his ties are 4
    The sum of his losses are 6

    The probability of his winning any particular toss is is 26 of 36 is 13 of 18
    The probability of his winning any subsequent toss after a tie, is still 13 if 18, however, his overall win odds will change slightly for each and every subsequent toss after an initial tie, and ties thereafter.
    Is there any way to incorporate the ties into one single calculation to get one % probability? I have no idea, this isn't a subject I've ever been able to understand fully.

  4. #4


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by NB10 View Post
    Is there any way to incorporate the ties into one single calculation to get one % probability? I have no idea, this isn't a subject I've ever been able to understand fully.
    It already is incorporated. For one toss, he will win 26 of 36 tosses, or 72.2% of the time.

  5. #5


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by Freightman View Post
    It already is incorporated. For one toss, he will win 26 of 36 tosses, or 72.2% of the time.
    Ah ok, see, I told you I don't get this stuff

    Those are pretty good odds, thanks Freightman!

  6. #6


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by Freightman View Post
    It already is incorporated. For one toss, he will win 26 of 36 tosses, or 72.2% of the time.
    This is incorrect, or at least misleading. The probability that player 1 wins is exactly 26/32=0.8125. That is, viewing a "round" as a sequence of dice rolls that continues until a player wins outright (i.e., re-rolling after a tie), player 1 will win 81.25% of rounds played.

  7. #7


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by ericfarmer View Post
    This is incorrect, or at least misleading. The probability that player 1 wins is exactly 26/32=0.8125. That is, viewing a "round" as a sequence of dice rolls that continues until a player wins outright (i.e., re-rolling after a tie), player 1 will win 81.25% of rounds played.
    Semantics are semantics.

    There is a caveat for 1 toss (post 4), which is covered by last paragraph of post 2. What you’re responding is my answer to a secondary question - both of our answers being both right or wrong - depending on how the question is interpreted. .

  8. #8


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by Freightman View Post
    Semantics are semantics.

    There is a caveat for 1 toss (post 4), which is covered by last paragraph of post 2. What you’re responding is my answer to a secondary question - both of our answers being both right or wrong - depending on how the question is interpreted. .
    "High roll wins, and ties are re-rolled" [my emphasis]. I'll let the OP clarify as needed, but this seems reasonably unambiguous to me.

    But, now that we're in the discussion, your comment in your initial post that "his overall win odds will change slightly for each and every subsequent toss after an initial tie, and ties thereafter" is also incorrect. If I am asked to assess my probability of winning before we begin rolling, I will respond with 0.8125. If we roll and tie, and I am asked to re-assess my probability of winning (i.e., updated with the information that we just rolled and tied), I will again respond with 0.8125.

  9. #9


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by ericfarmer View Post
    "High roll wins, and ties are re-rolled" [my emphasis]. I'll let the OP clarify as needed, but this seems reasonably unambiguous to me.

    But, now that we're in the discussion, your comment in your initial post that "his overall win odds will change slightly for each and every subsequent toss after an initial tie, and ties thereafter" is also incorrect. If I am asked to assess my probability of winning before we begin rolling, I will respond with 0.8125. If we roll and tie, and I am asked to re-assess my probability of winning (i.e., updated with the information that we just rolled and tied), I will again respond with 0.8125.
    Regardless, semantics aside, I liked your version. Different wording certainly explains things in different ways.

  10. #10


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    It would have been easier, in my view, and clearer, as well, as often is the case with BJ discussions, to state upfront that ties simply do not count, and that you continue to roll until there is a winner; i.e., you consider only resolved games.

    That is clearly the intent of the question, but it might have been stated slightly differently. In any event, I agree with Eric; 26/32 is clearly the only correct answer.

    Don

  11. #11


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Thanks Eric and Don for clarifying.

Similar Threads

  1. Probability-Related Question
    By mp13 in forum General Blackjack Forum
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 11-08-2018, 05:15 PM
  2. Probability Question
    By Clint in forum General Blackjack Forum
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 07-18-2016, 07:43 AM
  3. Probability Question
    By melfwoods in forum General Blackjack Forum
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 10-13-2014, 06:17 AM
  4. TT: Probability question
    By TT in forum Blackjack Main
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 09-10-2004, 07:53 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

About Blackjack: The Forum

BJTF is an advantage player site based on the principles of comity. That is, civil and considerate behavior for the mutual benefit of all involved. The goal of advantage play is the legal extraction of funds from gaming establishments by gaining a mathematic advantage and developing the skills required to use that advantage. To maximize our success, it is important to understand that we are all on the same side. Personal conflicts simply get in the way of our goals.