Individual hand simulator?

[Freightman]

I think there's a typo on line 37

Your sense of humour (Canadian spelling) May be as warped as mine. That was funny.

[UncleChoo]

If you want to find out ev on A7 v 2 at TC +3, +2 for traditional Zen, you may need to look up at +1.5, +1 at my table since I use half-deck resolution.

Side Count Neutral. Double: TC=1.5
[Win ] 195629 201867 212186 217738 226513 194746 163805 148766 503594 88406
[Push] 31798 30877 30179 29312 27735 33650 58101 33481 122071 26384
[Loss] 163396 157962 154561 149294 142733 145776 166193 204327 745125 127080
[W-L] 32233 43905 57625 68444 83780 48970 -2388 -55561 -241531 -38674
[W+P+L] 390823 390706 396926 396344 396981 374172 388099 386574 1370790 241870
[EV(%)] 8.247 11.24 14.52 17.27 21.1 13.09 -0.6153 -14.37 -17.62 -15.99
[EV2 ] 16.49 22.47 29.04 34.54 42.21 26.18 -1.231 -28.75 -35.24 -31.98
Side Count Neutral. Hit: TC=1.5
[Win ] 195284 201851 212186 217738 226513 199897 167650 150654 504303 92903
[Push] 32543 30897 30179 29312 27735 42481 67444 42810 147063 32428
[Loss] 162996 157958 154561 149294 142733 131794 153005 193110 719424 116539
[W-L] 32288 43893 57625 68444 83780 68103 14645 -42456 -215121 -23636
[EV(%)] 8.262 11.23 14.52 17.27 21.1 18.2 3.774 -10.98 -15.69 -9.772
Side Count Neutral. Stand: TC=1.5
[Win ] 196543 203082 213542 218443 236099 241125 142439 133150 470582 87920
[Push] 51347 49909 48206 47419 41535 49787 145414 44068 160362 44597
[Loss] 142933 137715 135178 130482 119347 83260 100246 209356 739846 109353
[W-L] 53610 65367 78364 87961 116752 157865 42193 -76206 -269264 -21433
[EV(%)] 13.72 16.73 19.74 22.19 29.41 42.19 10.87 -19.71 -19.64 -8.861
Side Count Neutral. No Double: TC=1.5
[Win ] 196543 203082 213542 218443 236099 241125 142439 150654 504303 87920
[Push] 51347 49909 48206 47419 41535 49787 145414 42810 147063 44597
[Loss] 142933 137715 135178 130482 119347 83260 100246 193110 719424 109353
[W-L] 53610 65367 78364 87961 116752 157865 42193 -42456 -215121 -21433
[EV(%)] 13.72 16.73 19.74 22.19 29.41 42.19 10.87 -10.98 -15.69 -8.861


Side Count Neutral. Double: TC=1
[Win ] 221189 228683 239316 245682 255626 220549 186649 170239 585232 102532
[Push] 36286 35360 33901 33158 31249 38748 65520 38779 140521 30867
[Loss] 187546 181430 176504 170669 163777 167121 190831 233997 858742 147487
[W-L] 33643 47253 62812 75013 91849 53428 -4182 -63758 -273510 -44955
[W+P+L] 445021 445473 449721 449509 450652 426418 443000 443015 1584495 280886
[EV(%)] 7.56 10.61 13.97 16.69 20.38 12.53 -0.944 -14.39 -17.26 -16
[EV2 ] 15.12 21.21 27.93 33.38 40.76 25.06 -1.888 -28.78 -34.52 -32.01
Side Count Neutral. Hit: TC=1
[Win ] 220777 228571 239316 245682 255626 226633 191768 172801 586755 108470
[Push] 37478 35589 33901 33158 31249 48901 76254 49882 170240 38075
[Loss] 186766 181313 176504 170669 163777 150884 174978 220332 827500 134341
[W-L] 34011 47258 62812 75013 91849 75749 16790 -47531 -240745 -25871
[EV(%)] 7.643 10.61 13.97 16.69 20.38 17.76 3.79 -10.73 -15.19 -9.21
Side Count Neutral. Stand: TC=1
[Win ] 222934 230203 240867 245743 267384 272934 163354 153391 547421 101932
[Push] 59238 57399 55178 54175 47354 57207 164805 51128 186998 52137
[Loss] 162849 157871 153676 149591 135914 96277 114841 238496 850076 126817
[W-L] 60085 72332 87191 96152 131470 176657 48513 -85105 -302655 -24885
[EV(%)] 13.5 16.24 19.39 21.39 29.17 41.43 10.95 -19.21 -19.1 -8.859
Side Count Neutral. No Double: TC=1
[Win ] 222934 230203 240867 245743 267384 272934 163354 172801 586755 101932
[Push] 59238 57399 55178 54175 47354 57207 164805 49882 170240 52137
[Loss] 162849 157871 153676 149591 135914 96277 114841 220332 827500 126817
[W-L] 60085 72332 87191 96152 131470 176657 48513 -47531 -240745 -24885
[EV(%)] 13.5 16.24 19.39 21.39 29.17 41.43 10.95 -10.73 -15.19 -8.859

Nice work! Was probably a hell of a coding exercise.

[21forme]

Your sense of humour (Canadian spelling) May be as warped as mine. That was funny.

I think it's a genetic thing, and I'll take that as a compliment (American spelling).

[UncleChoo]

I'm not intentionally kicking anyone on the chops (usually). My attempt is at an economy of words while drilling down to the actual issue.

Look: if it's a matter of you wanting to learn more indexes, by all means. CVData will do that, and you should have probably known that. I'm a big fan of learning as many as possible, because for me, it takes little energy to do so.

HOWEVER: It sounded like you wanted to create a better way of generating indexes (whatever that means):



In any event, it's all pretty meaningless. You just won't get much gain there. I was pretty clear when I said there were a dozen ways just to improve your blackjack today. I'll give you one for free:

Lock yourself in a room and improve your deck estimation. You will get more from that than adding indexes or generating "stronger" ones.

Congrats, UncleChoo! Now my next dozen posts need to be only a few words.

I realize this, and either way I'm glad I asked the question because Norm shined light on the fact that I'm using the CV sim tool in a very narrow minded way.

[refinery]

I realize this, and either way I'm glad I asked the question because Norm shined light on the fact that I'm using the CV sim tool in a very narrow minded way.

But how did you miss it? It's literally the drop down box on the first screen of the sim config.

[Freightman]

I think it's a genetic thing, and I'll take that as a compliment (American spelling).

Canadian spelling, American spelling. Fact of the matter is that I didn’t want Don to erroneously correct what he would deem to be an egregious error.

Don, btw, I must apologize. The open time slot I had next Monday during my New York trip has been filled. We will have to discuss nuances to the FBM ASC some other time.

[UncleChoo]

But how did you miss it? It's literally the drop down box on the first screen of the sim config.

Because I acted like an 8 year old getting a cool X-mas present. Didn't take the time to learn the tool or explore. Jumped right in making basic sims ha ha