See the top rated post in this thread. Click here

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 13 of 17

Thread: Problems when customizing KO count in CV (Playing and Betting strategy numbers)

  1. #1


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Problems when customizing KO count in CV (Playing and Betting strategy numbers)

    Hello

    I have difficulties in getting Casino Verite to work with my counting system, which is a customized version of the KO count, but with different IRCs, key counts and pivot points
    in order to avoid negative counts, like proposed by Vancura/Fuchs in their book.

    They propose e.g a Key Count of +22 rather than +2 for Single Deck, so all values must be elevated by 20. In my case, I tried to elevate all values by 100 for Single Deck (and similar elevations for other deck numbers).

    Since I want to play everything from 1 to 8 decks, I guess a Simple Playing Strategy is not sufficient, because I need different IRCs and different bet ramps for different numbers of decks. So I must define an "Advanced" / "Complex" Playing and Betting strategy, right?

    I therefore derived a Complex Playing Strategy based upon KO Preferred, and set the Initial Running Counts according to my needs to high positive numbers around 100, depending on the number of decks.

    My first problem regards Playing Strategy.

    I saw that even after I elevated the Initial Running Counts inherited from KO Preferred, the Index numbers for Insurance are still all +3 (regardless of number of decks), according to the uncustomized Vancura/Fuchs, where the Pivot Point is always +4 and Insurance one less. And the other index tables show the group indices G1 and G2 from KO count are still +4 and -4 etc., despite of my elevation of the Initial Running Counts.

    However, with my elevated IRCs, I will never encounter a Running Count of only +3. Do I have to elevate the Insurance counts (in this case e.g. from 3 to 103) and the other index numbers according to my elevated IRC, or does Casino Verite automatically adapt all index numbers?

    If yes, is this automatic adaptation only visible during a Play Session and not in the Playing Strategy tables?

    My second problem regards Betting Strategy.

    I want to setup a Complex Betting Strategy, since I use different bet spreads and different bet ramps depending on number of decks.

    But as opposed to Playing Strategy, I could not find a suitable Betting Strategy in the KO Preferred folder to derive my own Betting Strategy (bet ramps). I tried "1-6 spread", but it seemed that it is not possible to set the Running Count betting range to higher values than 50 (see attachment). But I would need e.g. a betting count range from 100 to 105 or something.

    Regards
    PinkChip

    PS: Sorry the screenshots seem much too small, despite having 1920 x 1080 pixels when I uploaded them. I tried to extract the essential content:

    PlayingStrategy03GroupsIndexesZoom.jpg
    BettingStrategy02CountRangeMax50Zoom.jpg
    Attached Images Attached Images
    Last edited by PinkChip; 07-23-2019 at 04:20 AM.

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Location
    In orbit around Saturn
    Posts
    897


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    First problem
    Did you Look at "Display tables" ?

    Second problem.
    Norm did not imagine that anyone could use such high count.

  3. #3


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by Phoebe View Post
    First problem
    Did you Look at "Display tables" ?

    Second problem.
    Norm did not imagine that anyone could use such high count.
    1.) No, it makes no difference whether I look at "Display tables" or "Define/Edit Strategy" and then "Open Strategy".
    If I change Insurance counts from 3 to 103, this is saved. But the other indices from KO are still +4, -4 etc.

    2.) And Bill Gates did not imagine that anyone could need more than 640 KB RAM on his computer :-)
    I think the limitation to +50 is a completely unnecessary restriction of the software. In my case, even a 1 Byte short int would be sufficient to allow also for +100 count values, so I see no need in restricting the maximum betting count to +50. I have good reasons why I want to elevate the KO numbers not only by 20 but by 100.

    [This reminds me of the Y2K problem, just because people thought that two-digit year numbers 00..99 would be sufficient.
    It takes just one Byte to store integers from -128 to +127 and 2 Bytes from -32768 to +32767.
    The Y2K problem had not been arised if they had used just one Byte more in order to store 4-digit year numbers like 1999 and 2000].
    Last edited by PinkChip; 07-23-2019 at 02:29 PM.

  4. #4


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by Wave View Post
    If you want one simplified strategy for all games, I recommend Norm's reKO. While not as effective as REKO Full, it is easy to learn and use. I used it a few times before switching to REKO 6 Deck Full and had winning nights each time. To run sims with it you can use the canned version in CVCX, and there are only 4 betting strategies, so I don't think that is too many to use for either sims or playing.

    To avoid negative numbers when playing, I used an IRC of 30 for 6 decks and an index of 52 (the true beauty of reKO is one index for all deviations...for all games) and started my bet ramp at 47. I ran sims with the canned values since it does not matter what IRC you use as long as you adjust your indexes and bet ramp accordingly.

    IRC for single deck would be 49, double deck 45, and 8 decks would be 23.

    Bet ramps for 6 and 8 decks start at 47, double deck 50, and single deck 51.

    Norm's article is well worth the read and includes all deviations and bet ramps...why reinvent the wheel?

    https://www.qfit.com/rekostrategy.htm


    Hi Wave

    Many thanks for your reply! I will read the REKO chapter again (I read Norm's two books in 2011 and remember that REKO has only one index at +2.

    But one question: you raised the index by 50 from +2 to +52, and start your bet ramp at +47 for 6 decks, but how do you enter the bet ramp in CV? See my second screenshot, where I have "Count Range Start" at 47 and "Count Range End" at 50. Whenever I try to increase the latter, it is not possible (50 seems to be the maximum number allowed). But even you need numbers above 50. (Scratch my head...)
    Last edited by PinkChip; 07-23-2019 at 03:08 PM.

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Location
    In orbit around Saturn
    Posts
    897


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Ho ! I misunderstood your procedure.
    You must simply keep original IRC and set new IRC in "Complex Playing Strategy" window.

    2019-07-23 23_59_34-Casino Vérité Playing Strategies.png

  6. #6


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Hmmm, thanks for the hint, but I think this "Force Initial RC to 100" doesn't work, because I have different IRCs for different numbers of decks. Instead, I must click on "Define/Edit Strategies", then open my own strategy and click on "Counts", see screenshot. Here I can enter different IRCs for different numbers of decks.

    PlayingStrategy01IinitialRunningCountsNew.jpg

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Location
    In orbit around Saturn
    Posts
    897


    1 out of 1 members found this post helpful. Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    So shift each item in "Insure" and "groups".

  8. #8


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by Phoebe View Post
    So shift each item in "Insure" and "groups".
    Yes, I could now change the Insure and Groups values according to my needs. This solves the Playing Strategy problem, but still I have the problem with the Betting Strategy (setting up a betting ramp which has values around +100 rather than +50 at most). But many thanks for your hint!

    PS: Now my counting system works in CV (Betting Ramp ranges from 30 to 34/35/37/40/42 depending on number of decks, raising of bets starts at 32, Insurance index is 33 etc.). Now Betting and Playing Strategy both work in CV, at least for 6 decks, which I tested. Will test it also for other deck numbers, especially Double Deck).

    Thanks for your advice!
    Last edited by PinkChip; 07-23-2019 at 05:41 PM.

  9. #9


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by Wave View Post
    For sims select Playing Strategies, then select Norm Wattenberger/QFIT, then select REKO. All the IRCs for all games will be correct, 1D -1, 2D -5, 6D -20, and 8D -27. Then to change the game you want to sim you can change the number of decks and shuffle point on the Setup option; it's way easier to sim different games this way.

    For Betting Strategy make sure you check Running Count and the Standard Bet Table should show RC, not TC. Then for 6D start the ramp at -3, which would translate to 47 when using IRC 30 (IRC 0 Bet Ramp Start +17=IRC 30 Bet Ramp Start 47). The sims will run using Norm's "by the book" strategy, but you will get the same real world results if you use IRC 30 and start your Bet Ramp at 47. Then when you switch to 1D sims use a Bet ramp start of +1, which = 51 IRC 49; 2D sims start 0, which = 50 IRC 45; 8D Bet Ramp same as 6D even though 8D IRC is -27/23.

    Comprende?
    The REKO strategy stuff is all clear to me. But what do you mean with "sims"? Using CVCX? I have no CVCX (maybe I should buy this, too, but that's another point). For the moment, I only want to PLAY, not "sim" (running simulations using CVCX).

    Yes, I have set up a Betting Strategy Complex, and checked Running Count rather than True Count. But I had to put my bet ramp from 30 to 42 rather than the desired 100 to 112, so had to subtract 70 from my running counts. Regarding Playing Strategy Complex, I could enter values of 100 but guess must adapt them to 30 (100 less 70), in order to make the Playing Strategy consistent with the Betting Strategy. But this will have a big drawback when I am playing: from time to time, I want to check if my Running Count is still correct, e.g. by clicking "Tray" "Discard Stats". But CV will then show a Running Count which is 70 below the RC in my head. Very awkward and this only because the Betting Strategy Complex dialog does not allow running count values greater than 50.
    Last edited by PinkChip; 07-24-2019 at 10:05 AM.

  10. #10


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    No problem, but see my previous post: your hints were helpful, especially the hint regarding counts of about 30. I now start e.g. the 6 Deck Shoe at IRC of +16 (rather than +86), raise my bets to 2 units at +32 (rather than 102, as originally planned), and put my max bet of 10 units at +40 (rather than 110).

  11. #11
    Random number herder Norm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    The mote in God's eye
    Posts
    12,461
    Blog Entries
    59


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Why would anyone want to set counts to such high numbers? The difficulties in keeping a mental count would increase dramatically.
    "I don't think outside the box; I think of what I can do with the box." - Henri Matisse

  12. #12


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by Norm View Post
    Why would anyone want to set counts to such high numbers? The difficulties in keeping a mental count would increase dramatically.
    I think starting at an IRC of 100 is actually easier than at zero. You don't have to care about negative numbers and sign switches.

    Starting at zero or in the negatives (as in standard Hi-Lo, KO and REKO) means that even when the RC is not hovering up and down, i.e. there is a slug of purely low or purely high cards, you must be aware that when the RC crosses the zero line, the absolute value of the RC is suddenly not decremented but incremented (or vice versa), which is a potential source of error.

    Regarding the length of the spoken or thought numbers, counting "minus two, minus one, zero, plus one, plus two" can be shortened to "m two, m one, zero, one, two" , but you can likewise shorten "98, 99, 100, 101, 102" to "98, 99, hundred, 1, 2" etc.

    The idea of starting the RC around 100 is btw. also seconded by literature, e.g. Fred Renzey in "Blackjack Bluebook II", 2006 edition, Chapter 12 "Mentor Count", pages 198-199, section "A 100 Counting Base" does exactly the same. I might have read this in additional books, too (have read about 25 such books), but can't exactly remember now.
    Last edited by PinkChip; 07-24-2019 at 01:59 PM.

  13. #13


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Hi PinkChip, its my 2nd day with CV and the forum, and a week after reading KO Vancura/Fuchs. I've been using BJA and enjoy the site very much, but it doesn't teach or simulate KO, that's when I purchased CV and came across your post the same day. I start my IRC at 15 and Key Count at 31 to avoid negative #s, so I can appreciate your start at 100. I've been able to modify a KO game on CV to start my IRC at 15, but haven't been able to adjust anything else, even after reading your post a few times. Any direction, screen shots, or additional tips you might offer would be appreciated. (Of course, Norm and company as well, if they read this post).

    Please let me know how I can reciprocate. I'm in Colorado.

    Thanks, Liverpool-007

    P.S. enjoyed your podcast interviews and Holy Rollers

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 5
    Last Post: 09-05-2015, 11:51 PM
  2. Ace side count and playing strategy
    By bemghochoo in forum General Blackjack Forum
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 06-04-2014, 09:24 PM
  3. Myoo: Recursion problems in strategy generation
    By Myoo in forum Blackjack Main
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 03-27-2009, 11:31 AM
  4. creatureman: Customizing the KO count
    By creatureman in forum Blackjack Main
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 05-30-2004, 08:24 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

About Blackjack: The Forum

BJTF is an advantage player site based on the principles of comity. That is, civil and considerate behavior for the mutual benefit of all involved. The goal of advantage play is the legal extraction of funds from gaming establishments by gaining a mathematic advantage and developing the skills required to use that advantage. To maximize our success, it is important to understand that we are all on the same side. Personal conflicts simply get in the way of our goals.