See the top rated post in this thread. Click here

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 13 of 21

Thread: Developing a Plan

  1. #1


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Developing a Plan

    I've played poker professionally for years and one thing it taught me is that a casino is not where I want to make a living. Now I own a business and just play poker recreationally. Thankfully I'm in LA and so this is easy, but I still make 6-10 trips to vegas per year.
    Poker players don't get comps ... at least not good ones. For me, there is value with having CET Diamond, for example. I could play the right video poker games at a tiny negative theoretical but there are plenty of -.26% BJ games in Vegas and my theory is that if I put in the time to learn a simple count (like REKO) then I can play a breakeven or slightly positive expectation game without drawing too much attention. That way I can keep my Diamond Status, which has some value to me, maybe be a slight favorite, and not get too much heat.


    My question is whether these are realistic goals. So, for example, can you achieve a +0.25% game with a 1:4 spread in a game that is normally -0.26% and largely avoid heat? For specific game, consider S17, LS, DAS, RSA 6 deck shoe 75% pen.

  2. #2


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    I'm going to take a stab at this, but I might be completely wrong...

    BJ, and most table games, don't generate very many comps, at all. Playing enough to generate comps would require a bet spread, as you said, for the pit boss to update your rating to earn comps. But of course, by doing so, that draws attention because they will notice you are spreading.

    I'm also not sure that a 1-4 spread is enough to break even.

    You might be better off at Video Poker, if your goal is to get those sort of comps. I think there is a website regarding CET Diamond, and how much coin-in you need to hit diamond. I'm pretty sure your equivalent "coin-in" for Blackjack will be around a hundred times higher than that.

    I will now let someone else correct everything I said.

  3. #3


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    I don’t know about others but I was still playing red chips when I started getting comps. Playing DD games (betting $25-$150) and 6 deck games spreading from $10 to $80 or occasionally playing 2 x $90, I started getting comps for Tunica, Biloxi and Las Vegas and don’t believe that you cannot get comps playing BJ. I never played any other game.

  4. #4


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Yeah, you can definitely get comps playing BJ. I get free Sunday-Thursday stays pretty much whenever, some offers for free flights to less popular destinations (laughlin, etc), etc. My question is whether we can turn a -.26 game into a +.25-+.75 game with a 1:4 spread with REKO count.

  5. #5


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by rhpmike View Post
    Yeah, you can definitely get comps playing BJ. I get free Sunday-Thursday stays pretty much whenever, some offers for free flights to less popular destinations (laughlin, etc), etc. My question is whether we can turn a -.26 game into a +.25-+.75 game with a 1:4 spread with REKO count.
    I will let the experts respond...but if you are talking 6 or 8 deck games, then no I don't think 1:4 spread is enough to break even...even with perfect BS and indexes. If double deck, then yes probably around break even. Get CVCX and Norm's work will answer all your questions.

  6. #6


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Are you planning to wong? If you do so to an extreme (and never play any negative count), you'll make money in the long run flat betting... Assuming you never wong, index play alone should bring that -.26% to a very slightly positive value for you, allowing you to make a little.. So, yes, you will likely win more than you lose with a 1:4 spread and the conditions you described.Whether or not you can cover travel expenses is a totally different question.

  7. #7


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    So, for example, can you achieve a +0.25% game with a 1:4 spread in a game that is normally -0.26% and largely avoid heat? For specific game, consider S17, LS, DAS, RSA 6 deck shoe 75% pen.
    Yes.

  8. #8


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    The risk here is that for BJ comps, they will monitor your skill level and cumulative win/loss - a lot of scrutiny where they might eventually determine that you are moving your bets with the count.

    I've been playing BJ for years at my local store (DD game) for fairly decent stakes and only spreading 1-4. But my comps are rated at the lowest level. I have the same player's card that any new chump gets. I suppose it's better than getting the boot....but that could be coming....

  9. #9


    1 out of 2 members found this post helpful. Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by Splitting Tens View Post
    Are you planning to wong? If you do so to an extreme (and never play any negative count), you'll make money in the long run flat betting... Assuming you never wong, index play alone should bring that -.26% to a very slightly positive value for you, allowing you to make a little.. So, yes, you will likely win more than you lose with a 1:4 spread and the conditions you described.Whether or not you can cover travel expenses is a totally different question.
    So this guy is now giving forum advice...yikes tread lightly all you newbies.

  10. #10


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by Counting_Is_Fun View Post
    So this guy is now giving forum advice...yikes tread lightly all you newbies.
    I participate in conversations here as I am actively learning the game. I post in hopes of being corrected and learning when my understanding is off. If I have made a false statement, show me where it is incorrect.
    Breaking down my post.. I have suggested that.
    1. If you never play at a negative count, you'll make money in the long run flat betting. I'll stand by this. If you only play at the slight disadvantage of TC = 0 and all positive counts, you will have the advantage over the house. Sometimes you'll win, sometimes you'll lose. Overall, you will do well.
    2. Index play alone will give you an extra .26% against the house edge. I'm willing to be corrected on this. The adjustment will be very, very close, but I don't have an exact number.
    3. If you play with all indices, you are playing a very close to even game. Then if you bet more with favorable counts than you do with unfavorable counts, you'll win more than you lose. This is just math. A 1:4 spread may not be exciting or bring great profits, but you will win more than you lose in the long run. I'll stand by this statement as well.

  11. #11


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by Splitting Tens View Post
    I participate in conversations here as I am actively learning the game. I post in hopes of being corrected and learning when my understanding is off. If I have made a false statement, show me where it is incorrect.
    Breaking down my post.. I have suggested that.
    1. If you never play at a negative count, you'll make money in the long run flat betting. I'll stand by this. If you only play at the slight disadvantage of TC = 0 and all positive counts, you will have the advantage over the house. Sometimes you'll win, sometimes you'll lose. Overall, you will do well.
    2. Index play alone will give you an extra .26% against the house edge. I'm willing to be corrected on this. The adjustment will be very, very close, but I don't have an exact number.
    3. If you play with all indices, you are playing a very close to even game. Then if you bet more with favorable counts than you do with unfavorable counts, you'll win more than you lose. This is just math. A 1:4 spread may not be exciting or bring great profits, but you will win more than you lose in the long run. I'll stand by this statement as well.
    Not practical, is it? How often does a 6 deck shoe go into a negative count, TC-1 or lower? You be getting up and down like a YO-YO.

  12. #12


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    I did not say it was practical (#1) - only mathematical. I figure that I first want to look at the mathematical ideal - and then deviate as little as possible so as to be practical.

  13. #13


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by Splitting Tens View Post
    I participate in conversations here as I am actively learning the game. I post in hopes of being corrected and learning when my understanding is off. If I have made a false statement, show me where it is incorrect.
    Breaking down my post.. I have suggested that.
    1. If you never play at a negative count, you'll make money in the long run flat betting. I'll stand by this. If you only play at the slight disadvantage of TC = 0 and all positive counts, you will have the advantage over the house. Sometimes you'll win, sometimes you'll lose. Overall, you will do well.
    2. Index play alone will give you an extra .26% against the house edge. I'm willing to be corrected on this. The adjustment will be very, very close, but I don't have an exact number.
    3. If you play with all indices, you are playing a very close to even game. Then if you bet more with favorable counts than you do with unfavorable counts, you'll win more than you lose. This is just math. A 1:4 spread may not be exciting or bring great profits, but you will win more than you lose in the long run. I'll stand by this statement as well.
    To avoid the crap comments directed to you, might be an idea to preface your comments with something like - I’m a newbie, my comments are subject to confirmation - I’m trying to learn by participation.

    The troll you are responding to likely hasn’t read the entire thread, and has taken delight with his comments in post 9. Though you are off, the errors are not egregious, and would be tempered with the suggested preface, or something similar. Further, your comments, though not part of accepted norm, are clearly identified by comments made stating your inexperience and being prone to errors. Dont worry about the schmuck. He will needle you with additional ridiculousness on your comments made to explain your approach.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. BlackJack Training - New site is developing
    By bjsim in forum The Disadvantage Forum
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 03-21-2016, 04:11 PM
  2. Developing Strategies for Unusual Games
    By Math Demon in forum Software
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 03-27-2014, 12:59 PM
  3. Developing a New Blackjack Game
    By DBJT in forum General Blackjack Forum
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 03-10-2014, 08:50 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

About Blackjack: The Forum

BJTF is an advantage player site based on the principles of comity. That is, civil and considerate behavior for the mutual benefit of all involved. The goal of advantage play is the legal extraction of funds from gaming establishments by gaining a mathematic advantage and developing the skills required to use that advantage. To maximize our success, it is important to understand that we are all on the same side. Personal conflicts simply get in the way of our goals.