Quote Originally Posted by mirageman View Post
Well, my questions were as stated. I can see how odds are better for winning the HAND by hitting as opposed to doubling. Now as for the money, I think yes I do have a different goal for now. I don't want to bring a large amount of cash to a casino and find myself doubling it all away. I'd rather have a better chance of winning a non-doubled bet than a lower chance of winning a doubled bet. If I build up a decent amount of winnings, maybe I'll be less stingy and DD at that point. But that's another matter. I wouldn't quit unless I start hating it. I barely started. I'll be content if I win some here and there.

Hmmm. I thought house edge was EXACTLY what you say it has nothing whatsoever to do with...well, what you are mathematically EXPECTED to win or lose anyway.. Thanks all!
You need to realize that BS was created by mathematicians and is regularly validated with powerful simulation software. You're more than welcome to deviate from BS, but you can't come back and complain that you're playing a losing game. BS gives you the best chance. Not the best chance of winning any one hand, but the best chance, dollar for dollar, of losing as little as possible. Without the powerful doubles to make up for other weak hands/losses, you're giving up money.