See the top rated post in this thread. Click here

Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: Supreme Court Says No to Policing for Profit

  1. #1


    1 out of 1 members found this post helpful. Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Supreme Court Says No to Policing for Profit

    All I got to say is it is about time.

    https://slate.com/news-and-politics/...rbg-timbs.html

  2. #2
    Random number herder Norm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    The mote in God's eye
    Posts
    12,470
    Blog Entries
    59


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Thanks for posting this. It's a very important ruling. It's still not enough. My reading suggests that many such violations will still occur and require expensive lawyering to recover confiscated goods, including cash.
    "I don't think outside the box; I think of what I can do with the box." - Henri Matisse

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    3rd rock from Sol, Milky Way Galaxy
    Posts
    14,158


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    So are the state and local governments going to start giving back all the money and property they stole?

  4. #4


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    dam, i love the car auctions from those things lol.

  5. #5


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Hi, all!

    Sadly, I agree with Norm's reading of the Timbs opinion. The greedy pigs in Indiana were simply too greedy and argued that the US Constitution's 8th amendment 'excessive fines' clause doesn't apply to the states or, alternatively, that it doesn't apply to in rem actions (actions against property). Those are both pretty silly arguments these days and it was easy enough that the court issued a rare UNANIMOUS decision. The case was remanded back to the lower court to determine whether forfeiture of a $42,000 vehicle is "excessive" given the maximum fine for the alleged offense is $10,000. It's not a huge ruling but at least it makes a dent in the grossly abusive and unconstitutional area of civil forfeiture.

    I suspect most states have some protections in their constitutions that are not being aggressively argued by victims of civil forfeiture scams in addition to the 4th and 5th amendment protections found in the US Constitution.

    Best to all,
    SiMi

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    3rd rock from Sol, Milky Way Galaxy
    Posts
    14,158


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    But how could asset forfeiture when you are even charged with anything be justified since there is no fine for being a citizen or looking suspicious.

  7. #7


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    YES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Finally someone in our governement got their head out their ass to see how ludicrous these actions had been.

    Now, how about retroactive rewards to people subjected to such unconstitutional events! (and I am not one of them, but I support those who were!)
    Luck is nothing more than probability taken personally!

  8. #8


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    That's great news, but gee wiz you'd think they could find a more flattering picture of the Notorious RBG. Cut the girl some slack!

Similar Threads

  1. Sports Betting and the Supreme Court
    By ZenMaster_Flash in forum General Blackjack Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 12-02-2017, 07:02 AM
  2. Replies: 50
    Last Post: 05-20-2016, 05:24 PM
  3. Supreme Court Ruling
    By Ouchez in forum General Blackjack Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 05-28-2014, 07:24 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

About Blackjack: The Forum

BJTF is an advantage player site based on the principles of comity. That is, civil and considerate behavior for the mutual benefit of all involved. The goal of advantage play is the legal extraction of funds from gaming establishments by gaining a mathematic advantage and developing the skills required to use that advantage. To maximize our success, it is important to understand that we are all on the same side. Personal conflicts simply get in the way of our goals.