See the top rated post in this thread. Click here

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 14 of 14

Thread: True Count of Running Count 21 Half Decks 6

  1. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    3rd rock from Sol, Milky Way Galaxy
    Posts
    14,348


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    The most accurate decisions come from spreading the data out more. Level 2 counts already spread it out about twice as much by having count tags of 2. But dividing by the number of half decks remaining compresses data rather than speed it out. A level 1 count would spread out data as much as a level 2 count if it divided by the number of double decks expressed to half deck accuracy. This would narrow the bell curve SD for the actual compared to the average in each integer TC bin. So if 6 half decks remained you would divide by 1.5 double decks.

    To illustrate the point about integer TC accuracy consider the following with all divisors to half deck accuracy with TC floored:
    (RC, number of half decks remaining: TC divided by number of half decks, number of full decks, and number of double decks):

    8, 10 half decks remaining: 0, 1, 3
    8, 9 half decks remaining: 0, 1, 3
    8, 8 half decks remaining: 1, 2, 4
    8, 7 half decks remaining: 1, 2, 4
    8, 6 half decks remaining: 1, 2, 5
    8, 5 half decks remaining: 1, 3, 6
    8, 4 half decks remaining: 2, 4, 8
    8, 3 half decks remaining: 2, 5, 10
    8, 2 half decks remaining: 4, 8, 16

    Between 1 deck and 5 decks remaining:
    For the RC of 8 dividing by half decks remaining spreads the data across 3 integer TC bins for a range of 4 TC.
    For the RC of 8 dividing by full decks remaining expressed to half deck accuracy spreads the same data across 5 integer TC bins for a range of 7 TC.
    For the RC of 8 dividing by double decks remaining expressed to half deck accuracy spreads the data across 7 integer TC bins for a range of 13 TC.

    Now a sim can make half deck bins to get more bins in the same range and spread out data across more bins that way to get tighter bell curves but then you have to take the math to an additional decimal place. People tend to think in integers. So doing what you can to keep everything you need to calculate or memorize to integers is easier for most people.
    Last edited by Three; 02-15-2019 at 07:45 AM.

  2. #12


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    I would use half deck TC for betting, so 3.5, and floor for playing decisions always. Even if say, you're at 3.9, and the index is 4, you don't use the index

  3. #13
    Senior Member bigplayer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Southern USA
    Posts
    1,684


    1 out of 1 members found this post helpful. Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    For insurance purposes 3.5. For everything else, 3. It depends on how your system was developed, but most systems are created using flooring which always rounds down. That means everything from 3.0 to 3.99 is counted as a 3 and everything from -0.01 to -1 counts as -1. If you want to use other methods (rounding or truncating) your system should be created using that method.

  4. #14


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No


    Kudos to Big Player and especially to Three for great responses.



Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Similar Threads

  1. True count vs Running count
    By zbest1966 in forum General Blackjack Forum
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 05-28-2018, 11:53 AM
  2. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 11-07-2014, 02:23 PM
  3. Converting KO Running Count to TKO True Count
    By MercySakesAlive in forum General Blackjack Forum
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 01-15-2014, 07:33 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

About Blackjack: The Forum

BJTF is an advantage player site based on the principles of comity. That is, civil and considerate behavior for the mutual benefit of all involved. The goal of advantage play is the legal extraction of funds from gaming establishments by gaining a mathematic advantage and developing the skills required to use that advantage. To maximize our success, it is important to understand that we are all on the same side. Personal conflicts simply get in the way of our goals.