Originally Posted by
DSchles
Read the whole thing, k_c. Nice to see you posting here, my friend.
1. Is there a reason why you make all the traditional positive count tags negative and vice versa? Found that odd.
2. I'm not understanding 27 subsets with RC zero of 52 cards remaining from 6 decks. Why such a small number?
3. Both your work and Eric's, above, clearly reiterate that if no count is employed, BS edge cannot possibly change as the shoe is depleted. Yet it took me about a week to disabuse two of our more prominent posters of this silly notion. In a similar vein, I'm still not understanding why people don't accept Griffin's explanation of the origin of the FA, which is clearly enunciated both in his book and mine. I've already given the references.
Don
Bookmarks