See the top rated post in this thread. Click here

Page 3 of 7 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast
Results 27 to 39 of 80

Thread: Secret Monkey Count for Pontoon (Spanish 21)

  1. #27


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by All Clear View Post
    Sure! Purchase "The Pro's Guide to Spanish 21 and Australian Pontoon" by Katarina Walker. She lists a counting system that easily brings Spanish 21 to a winning game- even a very small spread (1 - 3, for example) would do the trick of bringing the S17 (dealer stands on Soft 17) Spanish 21 game to better than even, using her counting system. A note that S17 is always no redoubling, so there is no need to mention that. Your dad should have thick skin, as counting often leads to some non-intuitive plays (hitting an 8-7 against a dealer 4 in some counts, hitting a 17 against a dealer A in most counts, etc.) and can elicit negative responses from some.

    If your dad is up for it, there are far more advanced counts (including 3-D ones, that incorporate four and five card hands in a superior way than simply using an adjustment for each, as both KatCount and my more advanced counting system do), but I don't think those that use these systems have given them out, unfortunately. : ( I'm actually surprised that others haven't responded- if you do searches on this forum, the Spanish 21 threads used to have far more back-and-forth activity. I got almost all my info from others in this forum, who were quite helpful.
    I’m not sure my dad would want to learn any sort of count but that’s his prerogative (I think he’s fine with just playing and losing and then playing some blackjack with me and following my bets). I am slightly interested in learning to count Spanish 21 though. I feel like it would increase my longevity at local casinos and could potentially be more lucrative (I would be playing heads up a lot, I almost always see empty Spanish 21 tables). Do you have any math to back up your count against kat’s or even kat’s against blackjack Hi-Lo?

  2. #28


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by RatherNotGiveMyRealName View Post
    I’m not sure my dad would want to learn any sort of count but that’s his prerogative (I think he’s fine with just playing and losing and then playing some blackjack with me and following my bets). I am slightly interested in learning to count Spanish 21 though. I feel like it would increase my longevity at local casinos and could potentially be more lucrative (I would be playing heads up a lot, I almost always see empty Spanish 21 tables). Do you have any math to back up your count against kat’s or even kat’s against blackjack Hi-Lo?
    Wait- your dad isn't willing to count cards? So why ask how to make the game break-even or have an advantage, in the post you wrote before this? In short, no, without counting cards (or finding a dealer that flashes) you can't make Spanish 21 a breakeven game. I'm surprised you thought there might be some other secret that can do it.

    Yes, the count I use was simmed, and I have the results, which include appropriate index numbers. I wouldn't use it otherwise. Kat has run simulations (she was a programmer, if I recall correctly), and gives detailed results for her counting system in her book.

  3. #29


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by All Clear View Post
    Wait- your dad isn't willing to count cards? So why ask how to make the game break-even or have an advantage, in the post you wrote before this? In short, no, without counting cards (or finding a dealer that flashes) you can't make Spanish 21 a breakeven game. I'm surprised you thought there might be some other secret that can do it.

    Yes, the count I use was simmed, and I have the results, which include appropriate index numbers. I wouldn't use it otherwise. Kat has run simulations (she was a programmer, if I recall correctly), and gives detailed results for her counting system in her book.
    I’ve read elsewhere that a very complex composition-dependent modified basic strategy in certain rule sets makes the game barely winning. I’ve convinced him to take up the A-5 count in Blackjack because it’s brain dead easy but I’m wondering if there is a similar easy count that yields minimal results (but a winning or even game) in Spanish 21. I may also be interested in your system as if I ever get flat-betted at Blackjack or any heat at all, I can go to the Spanish 21 tables and count. Are you willing or able to DM me any info about your system? I definitely will be getting into Spanish 21 soon here after I master blackjack.
    Last edited by RatherNotGiveMyRealName; 09-24-2019 at 06:19 PM.

  4. #30


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by RatherNotGiveMyRealName View Post
    I’ve read elsewhere that a very complex composition-dependent modified basic strategy in certain rule sets makes the game barely winning. I’ve convinced him to take up the A-5 count in Blackjack because it’s brain dead easy but I’m wondering if there is a similar easy count that yields minimal results (but a winning or even game) in Spanish 21. I may also be interested in your system as if I ever get flat-betted at Blackjack or any heat at all, I can go to the Spanish 21 tables and count. Are you willing or able to DM me any info about your system? I definitely will be getting into Spanish 21 soon here after I master blackjack.
    Your first sentence is almost surely false. If you read otherwise elsewhere, please provide links to said posts. It is true that composition-dependent items are far more important in SP21 than BJ, but it won't get you to positive EV flat-betting.

    I know of no simpler systems that Katarina's. Some might say SMC is simpler because it doesn't start with a running negative number, but most would likely say the Level 1 she uses is easier. My system is proprietary, unfortunately. The ones FireWalker, T3, ZenMaster, and others use are also proprietary, unfortunately. I wish there was more published literature about this game, but there isn't, and (for whatever reason) the others that play this game often aren't currently commenting on this forum. : (
    Last edited by All Clear; 09-26-2019 at 03:41 PM. Reason: My frown face defaulted to a smile face when originally posted. Weird.

  5. #31


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by All Clear View Post
    Your first sentence is almost surely false. If you read otherwise elsewhere, please provide links to said posts. It is true that composition-dependent items are far more important in SP21 than BJ, but it won't get you to positive EV flat-betting.

    I know of no simpler systems that Katarina's. Some might say SMC is simpler because it doesn't start with a running negative number, but most would likely say the Level 1 she uses is easier. My system is proprietary, unfortunately. The ones FireWalker, T3, ZenMaster, and others use are also proprietary, unfortunately. I wish there was more published literature about this game, but there isn't, and (for whatever reason) the others that play this game often aren't currently commenting on this forum. : (
    What would be your suggestion if I were to learn Spanish 21? Kat walker, SMC, look elsewhere? And where can I find any math on these counts, like SCORE, EV, or risk or ruin?

  6. #32


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by RatherNotGiveMyRealName View Post
    What would be your suggestion if I were to learn Spanish 21? Kat walker, SMC, look elsewhere? And where can I find any math on these counts, like SCORE, EV, or risk or ruin?
    Walker's book, definitely. There is a lot of information given (skip the Pontoon sections), with many charts and graphs. Katarina Walker was a computer programmer, and dove deep into much of the mathematics behind the game. Unfortunately, the count system she uses is quite weak (though still more than enough to easily make the game a winning one). If you have any connections that can provide you with SMC, ask them for it. I actually don't think Automatic Monkey (the creator) minds if it is given out (he uses a far more advanced counting system, and hasn't used SMC in years), but I can't make that call, and don't have his contact info to check. If someone else gives it to you, awesome. It is only a level 2 count (with no side count), and while there is so much further to go, that is definitely a big step beyond Katarina's count.

  7. #33


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Does anyone have indices for a double double down spanish 21 game? I have the H17 ones, though don't know the index plays for 7-9 vs 2-5

  8. #34


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Can I get a copy from SMC [email protected]. Thanks a lot!

  9. #35


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by All Clear View Post
    Katarina Walker was a computer programmer, and dove deep into much of the mathematics behind the game. Unfortunately, the count system she uses is quite weak (though still more than enough to easily make the game a winning one). If you have any connections that can provide you with SMC, ask them for it. I actually don't think Automatic Monkey (the creator) minds if it is given out (he uses a far more advanced counting system, and hasn't used SMC in years), but I can't make that call, and don't have his contact info to check. If someone else gives it to you, awesome. It is only a level 2 count (with no side count), and while there is so much further to go, that is definitely a big step beyond Katarina's count.
    Do you know the SMC advantage change per true count for Spanish 21 S17?

  10. #36


    0 out of 1 members found this post helpful. Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by All Clear View Post
    What questions do you have? I'm not permitted to give out the copy I have (I don't use it, instead using a more complicated system with an ace side count, that gives better results), but can answer general questions you may have. In short, it is a level two count for Spanish 21, designed for the S17 game. More powerful than Katarina's level one count.
    If you are still around, All Clear, then you can answer the question posed by Aceside in the post “Index Chart for Secret Monkey Count” opened by Lifelit on 3-10-2021. Aceside requested how to use an ASC with SMC and Cohiba’s unsuccessfully attempted sims on SMC and SMC with ASC. I see in post 28 on 9-24-2019 you said “Yes, the count I use was simmed, and I have the results, which include appropriate index numbers. I wouldn't use it otherwise.” Lifelit’s post was closed on 3-24-2021 because Don was concerned the post was getting too long with no answers since no one was able to sim SMC with ASC for Spanish 21 S17 to get answers. So, I searched to see if someone else simmed SMC with ASC. And then I found your post. You already have sim results for SMC with ASC so why reinvent the wheel. You should be able to then definitely answer the questions that were raised by Aceside and others on Spanish 21 S17 using SMC with ASC.

    I did not get a chance to post my suggestion on how to use SMC with ASC before the post was closed. Aceside and other readers of Lifelit’s 3-10-21 post would appreciate answers on how to use SMC with ASC. So, I am replying to this post with my suggestion of how to use SMC with ASC below.

    So please verify or disprove if my analysis below on how to use SMC with ASC is correct. I do not want to give incorrect information to users of this forum, and you are the perfect person to ask. Also please keep in mind that my numbers listed below are approximate and not exact.

    I had said that the basic strategy advantage gain per true count for SMC for Spanish 21 S17 is approximately 0.5% so I will use 0.5% per SMC true count in my discussion below. This is important for me to finish my analysis of SMC with ASC for Spanish 21 so the first question I need answered is what is the basic strategy advantage gain per true count for SMC for Spanish 21 S17 as Norm had concerns that 0.5% may not be correct. I will use that assumption in my analysis below.

    So, I will list my analysis of SMC with ASC for Spanish 21 S17 below. Aceside wanted to know how to use an ASC with SMC for Spanish 21 S17. I would appreciate if you (or someone else if you are not around anymore) can verify my results before players use them or disprove my results if incorrect.

    Before I begin to present my analysis of SMC with ASC I would like to compare SMC with ASC to HL with ASC both for Spanish 21, S17 as shown below.

    Using SMC with ASC is much easier and a seamless transfer for the HL blackjack player to SMC Spanish 21 S17 as the betting is the same, both HL for blackjack and SMC for Spanish 21 S17 are balanced, and both use basic strategy with a few important strategy changes. Using HL for Spanish 21 S17 leads to a difficult (for HL blackjack players who use only balanced counts) unbalanced count with ASC adjustments for both betting and playing. With SMC only a single ASC adjustment for playing is required and that adjusted count is used with (Kat-HL indices + 4) for all playing situations.

    First some definitions for ASC:
    Adef = deficiency of Aces left in the shoe = Ap - 4*dp.
    Aexc = excess Aces left in the shoe = (-1)*(Adef) = 4*dp – Ap.
    dp = decks played and Ap = Aces played.

    Using unbalanced HL with ASC, ASC adjustments to HL must be made for both betting and playing where brc = betting running count = HL + Aexc and psrc = playing strategy running count = HL + Adef. HL, psrc = HL + Adef and brc = HL + Aexc are all unbalanced at four per deck and thus are unwieldy for the blackjack HL player.

    Using balanced SMC with ASC, brc = SMC so ASC adjustment to SMC needs to be made only for playing strategies where psrc = SMC + 2*(Adef). brc = SMC and psrc = SMC + 2*(Adef) are both balanced.

    So here is my answer about SMC for Spanish 21 S17. As I mentioned earlier, the numbers given are not exact but are approximate and I just need to know if they are close enough for players to use against Spanish 21 S17. I do not need exact numbers.

    1. For betting Spanish 21 S17, use SMC the same as you would use HL for betting blackjack.
    Both HL for blackjack and SMC for Spanish 21 S17 start with an approximate house edge of 0.5% and basic strategy edge increases about 0.5% per true count. Norm was skeptical about the 0.5% increase in basic strategy advantage per SMC true count for Spanish 21 S17 so I need this verified. This is especially important to know so correct betting can be used with SMC.

    2. For playing strategy indices, use psrc = playing strategy running count = SMC + 2*Adef.
    By adding 2*Adef to SMC to get psrc what that effectively does is change the tag value of the Ace from minus two in SMC to zero in psrc which is perfect for playing strategies. Then (Kat-HL-indices + 4) can be used with this psrc. No other adjustments need to be made to the indices and no new indices need to be learned.

    So, for SMC with ASC, I would use Spanish 21, S17 basic strategy from Wizard of Odds and then just memorize the following thirteen most important playing strategy adjustments using psrc = SMC + 2*Adef with the (Kat-HL + 4) indices shown below. You could use psrc = SMC + 2*Adef with all of (Kat-HL + 4) indices but I want to keep the system simple and easy to use with just these top thirteen strategy change which I believe will get most of the gain from SMC with ASC for Spanish 21 S17.

    psrc = SMC + 2*(Adef) indices = (Kat-HL indices + 4)
    Standing indices.
    If hard 13 is 6-7 then increase indices below by 2.
    If hard 14 is 7-7 then increase indices below by 2.
    Player’s total………Dealer’s Up Card
    ………………………..…2….…….3….. …….4……..….5….…….6
    13……………………………..……6…… ……4……….….2………..3
    14…………………..….3…………2….... ..0

    Late Surrender indices.
    If hard 15 is 7-8 then increase indices below by 3.
    Player’s total………Dealer’s Up Card
    …………………..………9….…….T….. .…….A
    15…………………..… 6…………4……….….5
    16………………..…….4…………2….... ....2

    So, for Spanish 21 S17 memorize these 13 indices and use psrc = SMC + 2*Adef with these indices. Then use Spanish 21 S17 basic strategy as given in Wizard of Odds for all other plays.

    An ASC for SMC used with Spanish 21 S17 is to be contrasted with an ASC for HL used with blackjack where an ASC for HL and blackjack is basically worthless as an ASC for HL for blackjack gives almost no help with playing strategy and the Ace is already counted as -1 in HL which is perfect for blackjack betting.

    SMC has a significantly higher BE than Kat-HL and psrc = SMC + 2*Adef has a significantly higher PE than Kat-HL. So, SMC with ASC should have a significantly higher SCORE than Kat's HL for Spanish 21 S17 which is what you stated in your posts above.

    Also, SMC is balanced unlike Kat-HL which is unbalanced at four per deck. So, SMC and psrc true counts can be calculated just like HL true counts for blackjack.

    And use (Kat-HL-indices + 4) for psrc indices so there are no new indices to learn or adjustments to be made.

    So that is my answer to both Lifelit and Aceside questions on SMC for Spanish 21 S17.

    I personally use the “more complicated” HL primacy count with two plus/minus side counts that I will not get into here but suffice is to say that the SMC with ASC system I mentioned above for Spanish 21 S17 seems to be an amazingly simple and powerful system.

    Again, if you or someone else can verify my answer, I would appreciate it as I want only correct information for users of this forum.
    Last edited by bjanalyst; 03-29-2021 at 02:42 AM.

  11. #37
    Random number herder Norm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    The mote in God's eye
    Posts
    12,461
    Blog Entries
    59


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    No matter how many times anyone attempts to explain anything to you, you just ignore them and repeat incorrect statements followed by massive verbiage.
    "I don't think outside the box; I think of what I can do with the box." - Henri Matisse

  12. #38


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by Norm View Post
    No matter how many times anyone attempts to explain anything to you, you just ignore them and repeat incorrect statements followed by massive verbiage.
    Delete his posts.

  13. #39


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by bjanalyst View Post
    the basic strategy advantage gain per true count for SMC for Spanish 21 S17 is approximately 0.5% so I will use 0.5% per SMC true count in my discussion below. This is important for me to finish my analysis of SMC with ASC for Spanish 21
    Your basic assumption is wrong. So the thesis based on that assumption is wrong.

Page 3 of 7 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Looking to learn SP21 indices for Secret Monkey Count
    By mattcloned in forum General Blackjack Forum
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 09-24-2019, 09:35 PM
  2. Secret Monkey Count (Spanish 21) ~ Full Index Chart Request
    By Fire Walker in forum General Blackjack Forum
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 12-22-2017, 07:56 AM
  3. H17 Spanish 21/Pontoon indices?
    By Bushie in forum General Blackjack Forum
    Replies: 37
    Last Post: 06-14-2017, 09:20 AM
  4. Strange pontoon/spanish 21 variation
    By BJjunkey92 in forum General Blackjack Forum
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 03-03-2017, 03:12 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

About Blackjack: The Forum

BJTF is an advantage player site based on the principles of comity. That is, civil and considerate behavior for the mutual benefit of all involved. The goal of advantage play is the legal extraction of funds from gaming establishments by gaining a mathematic advantage and developing the skills required to use that advantage. To maximize our success, it is important to understand that we are all on the same side. Personal conflicts simply get in the way of our goals.