Quote Originally Posted by ericfarmer View Post
So to answer Three's question: why are my reported numbers in the referenced write-up different from those reported elsewhere, even for the same setup (number of decks, penetration, rules, etc.)? The short answer is because they are computed differently. Most reported figures use the calculation described by Griffin, based on single-card removals, effectively "linearizing" behavior which is decidedly non-linear. My figures use what I argue is a more useful/intuitive-- but much more computationally expensive-- method of calculation.

Eric
Somebody asked this question a few years back.