How can this be calculated?

[blueman]

Kind of like a mix of ian Anderson and the martingale system, i got to thinking.

What if i played a strategy that was like this:

ANY HOUSE EDGE always bet 1 unit

ANY PLAYER EDGE:
bet 1 unit, if lose bet 2 units, if lose bet 4 units, all the way to table max, then stay at table max until win.

After any win go back to 1 unit, regardless of count.

If count ever goes into house edge then go to 1 unit.

Pretty much an ultimate cover play, can this even be profitable? How could i calculate the important numbers for something like this?

[BoSox]

ANY PLAYER EDGE:
bet 1 unit, if lose bet 2 units, if lose bet 4 units, all the way to table max, then stay at table max until win.

That is a real bad idea. I do not even want to think about it.

After any win go back to 1 unit, regardless of count.

Horrible!

[Freightman]

Kind of like a mix of ian Anderson and the martingale system, i got to thinking.

What if i played a strategy that was like this:

ANY HOUSE EDGE always bet 1 unit

ANY PLAYER EDGE:
bet 1 unit, if lose bet 2 units, if lose bet 4 units, all the way to table max, then stay at table max until win.

After any win go back to 1 unit, regardless of count.

If count ever goes into house edge then go to 1 unit.

Pretty much an ultimate cover play, can this even be profitable? How could i calculate the important numbers for something like this?

I see total obliteration of your bankroll.

[ZenMaster_Flash]

blueman ...

Save yourself your pride and give up on this asinine nonsense.

[blueman]

I know its ridiculous, but maybe its good for comps and a small base unit. Better than basic strat.

This is a comp earning idea**

[Bubbles]

I have a friend who only parlays in positive counts and flat bets in neutral/negative. He's received a lot of back offs. Your martingale mileage may vary, maybe.

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

[Freightman]

I know its ridiculous, but maybe its good for comps and a small base unit. Better than basic strat.

This is a comp earning idea**

You'll earn lots of comps. You'll also go broke earning those comps.
When I was in high school, we would get these ridiculous punishments of having to write lines.

Your punishment is a paltry 100 lines of
"I will never use my ridiculous Martingale style idea to win comps"

If you're Catholic, say Hail Mary's.
If you're Jewish, take a dunk in the Mikvah.
If you're (American) Indian, smoke a pipe.
Etc., etc.

[Freightman]

I have a friend who only parlays in positive counts and flat bets in neutral/negative. He's received a lot of back offs. Your martingale mileage may vary, maybe.

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

Far better than what OP described, but still to far from optimal with lots of danger. A bad run causes shrinkage among men.

[BoSox]

A bad run causes shrinkage among men.

To say the least!

[Phoebe]

After any win go back to 1 unit.

What a cover play
Normal player never do that.

[blueman]

Yeah it was just a thought lol that's why i posted it

[blueman]

If its plus ev then why will i go broke? I have a big bank roll

[Freightman]

Kind of like a mix of ian Anderson and the martingale system, i got to thinking.

What if i played a strategy that was like this:

ANY HOUSE EDGE always bet 1 unit

ANY PLAYER EDGE:
bet 1 unit, if lose bet 2 units, if lose bet 4 units, all the way to table max, then stay at table max until win.

After any win go back to 1 unit, regardless of count.

If count ever goes into house edge then go to 1 unit.

Pretty much an ultimate cover play, can this even be profitable? How could i calculate the important numbers for something like this?

Before I decide to figure out how grotesque this is, what's min and max on this gem of a scheme.