Here is the results that Tthree requested:
UBZII with full indices
UBZII.jpg
Combined UBZII
Combined UBZII.jpg
Here is the results that Tthree requested:
UBZII with full indices
UBZII.jpg
Combined UBZII
Combined UBZII.jpg
Moses, $5 per hour increase, based upon a $5 minimum bet. How many $5 tables are you playing at the Peppermill, the Atlantis, Grand Sierra, etc.?????? So, for you to take this into account, you need to multiply most of these dollar amounts by 2 (if $10 min bets) or 5 (if $25 min bets). Yeah I know, you don't bet less than purple, so forget the previous examples.
"Your honor, with all due respect: if you're going to try my case for me, I wish you wouldn't lose it."
Fictitious Boston Attorney Frank Galvin (Paul Newman - January 26, 1925 - September 26, 2008) in The Verdict, 1982, lambasting Trial Judge Hoyle (Milo Donal O'Shea - June 2, 1926 - April 2, 2013) - http://imdb.com/title/tt0084855/
The UBZII simulation I ran using CVCX and the two parameter UBZII I use CVDATA. I am not sure why it said 100% backcounting. What I did was did a standard simulation in CVDATA then I set the shuffle point, rules, playing strategy to be UBZII and betting to be the inverse of my secondary count on betting side count along with the betting strategy. Then I hit start sim after the simulation is completed I hit "Call CVCX" to determine the optimal bet for the count system. Then it displayed "Backcounting 100%". I don't know why. Maybe Norm can answer that question. Well, both systems betting their own optimal ramp the ROR happens to be different I don't think there is anything we can do about that.
I set the bankroll for both simulation at $3000 but set different trip bankroll which I don't think will affect the overall results. I was just looking for SCORE and N0. But anyways the penetration is 1 deck cut off for both simulation. The rule used for both simulation is six deck S17,DAS,LS. The spread is the same 1-16 bet spread for both simulations.
I fixed the trip bankroll to match the second simulation.
UBZII.jpg
Last edited by seriousplayer; 05-22-2017 at 07:36 PM.
I am looking forward to your results to be honest. Lately i have been experiencing some bad results applying KO full. (i know it is part of the game but i am getting impatient). I feel like being stuck getting nowhere, neither forward nor backward.
Sent from my LG-H955 using Tapatalk
Last edited by ferenc11; 05-23-2017 at 01:24 AM.
I have a question regarding HI OPT II. I would be very much honoured if ZenMaster replied but of course anyone can jump in.
When applying HI OPT II (i really hope you will understand the question or i can express my question clearly) do you experience wild swings as well just as the same way as using KO?
Or just by playing HI OPT II do you feel "safer" expecting positive and profitable situations?
The reason why i am asking this because i am definetely losing faith in KO and i feel that my mind has opened up for something else or bigger to absorb.
Thank You
Knowing what's going on with the (A) is important. Counting the (A) the same thing as a {T} doesn't pan out well when doubling 11. Let's say you have a roughly neutral count, consisting of a large number of surplus (A), 11vs9, and if not for the quantity of (A) in the remainder of the deck, the TC would be more to the tune of -5. Playing decision should be to hit rather than double. When I was first learning to play, I counted the (A) in with the {T}, used Hi-Lo. 30 or so years later, I look at the (A) and {T} as being worlds apart. I believe an (A) side count is important enough to impact the long haul.
You count Aces per Quarter Deck
.. and those wild swings are only partially tamed by Hi-Opt II
BlackJack is a game of very high volatility. Swings of fortune
are part and parcel of how we play; ergo we have BIG bankrolls.
"Your honor, with all due respect: if you're going to try my case for me, I wish you wouldn't lose it."
Fictitious Boston Attorney Frank Galvin (Paul Newman - January 26, 1925 - September 26, 2008) in The Verdict, 1982, lambasting Trial Judge Hoyle (Milo Donal O'Shea - June 2, 1926 - April 2, 2013) - http://imdb.com/title/tt0084855/
Bookmarks