Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 13 of 14

Thread: Chunky green backoffs

  1. #1


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Chunky green backoffs

    Hi all. I was just wondering about back off frequency depending on the type of action a player plays. Obviously very few APs would or could play purple action with much longevity and black seems to be close to the breaking point of what is tolerable almost anywhere. Some places find chunky green action laughable while others find it alarming. I am currently a green chipper and just wondering what level of heat I could expect generally? Hard question to answer generally I know, but I am trying to get a sense of what cover is necessary at my level of play. Also, are there any places which are tolerant of aggressive spreading of blacks? Obviously no need for specifics, just curious. Thanks.

  2. #2


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Cover, for cover's sake, is silly. The house usually knows what you're doing. So, in place of cover, various stratagems.that is in th eye of the beholder.

    Rule of thumb, but not bulletproof - the better the game, the lower the tolerance. I know several tolerant places where critters are told not to sweat action. Cuts are lousy. The less tolerant places usually have better beatable games. The foregoing is not a Vegas approach. Fwiw.

  3. #3


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by Freightman View Post
    Cover, for cover's sake, is silly. The house usually knows what you're doing. So, in place of cover, various stratagems.that is in th eye of the beholder.

    Rule of thumb, but not bulletproof - the better the game, the lower the tolerance. I know several tolerant places where critters are told not to sweat action. Cuts are lousy. The less tolerant places usually have better beatable games. The foregoing is not a Vegas approach. Fwiw.
    So when you say they usually know what youre doing... why continue to allow it? Just because you wont hurt their bottom line?

  4. #4


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by BakaFortuna View Post
    So when you say they usually know what youre doing... why continue to allow it? Just because you wont hurt their bottom line?
    Just because you're counting doesn't mean you're a threat.

  5. #5


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by moses View Post
    Your expectation of profit should not exceed their tolerance level. Think of it like a pitcher in baseball. Throwing high and inside only counts as one ball. But if he keeps doing it or has that reputation, he will find himself in trouble, in more ways than one.
    Right well that's a good analogy for me as someone who loves baseball. So when you say don't win above their "tolerance" do you mean in one session or over an extended period of time?

  6. #6


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by Freightman View Post
    Just because you're counting doesn't mean you're a threat.
    Is a threat someone with a positive hourly EV (say 30-40 an hour) or is a threat someone who has won too much over a long period of time?

  7. #7


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    A casino threat is not a counter per se. A poor counter well funded is very welcome. A good counter underfunded is welcome to lay. A good counter who is well funded is generally not welcome to play.

    Further, allowances on game conditions, which vary from store to store, need to be taken into account, so, a well funded counter playing 4/6 can usually play fir quite a while.

  8. #8


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by moses View Post
    Both. Session. I try to see what they see. Most people walk up and lose their money in 50 hands. Or chase by constantly going to into the wallet. Now I come along and play them even for 45 minutes or make a small but quick profit and exit. Get in, get paid, get out and no one really noticed you.

    Extended period of time. Make sure your losing sessions get recorded. Dont worry they rarely fail to jot down a win. I dont hide chips. But i hold the ones that cant add up to a black.
    I do the same. And I rat hole a couple hundred here and there. I always try and make sure they record ALL my cash ins. Only can convince them so long.

  9. #9


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Great advice from Freightman and Moses. There isn't one universal threshold. Just be mindful of the cost of cover at a poor ruled game or limited BR. There seems to be two teams on this board; Those who don't believe in cover, and those who live by it. Largely depends what type of joint you are playing at.

  10. #10


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by Freightman View Post
    Further, allowances on game conditions, which vary from store to store, need to be taken into account, so, a well funded counter playing 4/6 can usually play fir quite a while.
    When you state "a well funded counter playing 4/6...", what do you mean by that? Either I am completely dense today (perhaps many days), or that comment is just not clear to me (and perhaps others).
    "Your honor, with all due respect: if you're going to try my case for me, I wish you wouldn't lose it."

    Fictitious Boston Attorney Frank Galvin (Paul Newman - January 26, 1925 - September 26, 2008) in The Verdict, 1982, lambasting Trial Judge Hoyle (Milo Donal O'Shea - June 2, 1926 - April 2, 2013) - http://imdb.com/title/tt0084855/

  11. #11


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by Frank Galvin View Post
    When you state "a well funded counter playing 4/6...", what do you mean by that? Either I am completely dense today (perhaps many days), or that comment is just not clear to me (and perhaps others).
    A good well funded counter, in a tolerant joint, should be able to play for some time with pen at 4/6.a lousy counter should be able to play forever.

  12. #12


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Post

    Quote Originally Posted by Freightman View Post
    Cover, for cover's sake, is silly. The house usually knows what you're doing. So, in place of cover, various stratagems.that is in th eye of the beholder.

    Rule of thumb, but not bulletproof - the better the game, the lower the tolerance. I know several tolerant places where critters are told not to sweat action. Cuts are lousy. The less tolerant places usually have better beatable games. The foregoing is not a Vegas approach. Fwiw.
    Freightman, just wondering if you would clarify please. I think I know exactly what you meant, but not 100% sure. By saying "The foregoing is not a Vegas approach", you meant that there aren`t any casinos in Vegas that tell their critters to not sweat action, right? I didn`t know whether you meant that, or that the "various strategems" approach in your opinion wasn`t a good approach for Vegas...

  13. #13


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by SplitFaceDisaster View Post
    Freightman, just wondering if you would clarify please. I think I know exactly what you meant, but not 100% sure. By saying "The foregoing is not a Vegas approach", you meant that there aren`t any casinos in Vegas that tell their critters to not sweat action, right? I didn`t know whether you meant that, or that the "various strategems" approach in your opinion wasn`t a good approach for Vegas...
    Vegas Shoots first and asks questions later. In essence correct, however, there are places that do take good action, and Tolerate it. That being said, the shitholes of Vegas, on a per capita basis to other locations, will bounce you much quicker.

    By stratagems, I'm referring to strategies that give you spread, but look ploppy in nature.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Jurisdictions where backoffs are not allowed
    By beta in forum General Blackjack Forum
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: 01-09-2017, 07:10 PM
  2. Backoffs with max bet below $50
    By FalseCount in forum General Blackjack Forum
    Replies: 33
    Last Post: 01-21-2016, 07:35 PM
  3. Movin' On Up: red to green or green to black
    By SiMi in forum General Blackjack Forum
    Replies: 32
    Last Post: 03-21-2014, 01:22 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

About Blackjack: The Forum

BJTF is an advantage player site based on the principles of comity. That is, civil and considerate behavior for the mutual benefit of all involved. The goal of advantage play is the legal extraction of funds from gaming establishments by gaining a mathematic advantage and developing the skills required to use that advantage. To maximize our success, it is important to understand that we are all on the same side. Personal conflicts simply get in the way of our goals.