RA index in CVData

**Norm** · 11-24-2016, 01:40 PM

It's borderline at max +3. But, set the max at +4, which is the actual optimal max bet if you want an index. In the end, it isn't going to matter to how much you make in a year. Going back to CVCX after generating all the RA indices that you are going to use will likely increase the bets. And may increase the max bet to +4 with Rational Bets.

If you use RA indices, you're going to double fewer times.

**Phoebe** · 11-24-2016, 01:49 PM

Thank you, Norm.
It was mainly to underestand.
In fact, I play REKO (with some ingredient of CoB) and in regard of my bets my real RoR is below 0.001%.
I don't really need RA indices.

**Phoebe** · 11-24-2016, 02:42 PM

BTW, in REKO-F, RA indices for A7vs2 and A6vs2 are same as A8vs6 and A8vs5
And frequencies are same.
Are gain in EV much lower ? To explain that simple REKO don't use them.
What if I use +2 too for them ?

**Norm** · 11-24-2016, 02:49 PM

Who knows. Completely different strategy.

**Phoebe** · 11-24-2016, 02:53 PM

Originally Posted by Norm

Who knows. Completely different strategy.

Do you remember how you choosed indices for REKO ?

**BJFan** · 11-24-2016, 03:13 PM

CVIndex HiLo Greater accuracy

9v2 EV max DD>=1
9v2 RA Max Bet @3 sometimes DD>=1, sometimes DD>=6, sometimes No DD
9v2 RA Max Bet @6 DD>=1

I guess there's something wrong here.

**Norm** · 11-24-2016, 05:19 PM

Make certain you are running at a high level of confidence. I see no problem. RA index generation is absurdly complex.

**Norm** · 11-24-2016, 05:25 PM

Originally Posted by Philippe B

Do you remember how you choosed indices for REKO ?

No, and it's not relevant. Seriously, everything, and I mean, everything in blackjack changes everything else. I provide examples to display a general concept of what goes on. But, I can't provide every conceivable combination of factors. That would require a million pages. That's why I provide software. But, the numbers that I do provide are quite good for the majority od situations.

**BJFan** · 11-24-2016, 06:06 PM

9v2, HiLo, Beat to Death, RA with Max Bet @3
I ran it 6 times, , four times DD>=1, two times No DD
Weird

**Norm** · 11-24-2016, 06:18 PM

So, what do you think should be the answer?

**BJFan** · 11-24-2016, 06:28 PM

I think it must be always DD>=1 as RA doesn't affect this play.

**Norm** · 11-24-2016, 06:33 PM

Then play that way. I will stick by the calculations.

**BJFan** · 11-24-2016, 06:42 PM

OK, but that's the problem, the calcvulations give contradictory advices, sometimes to double down, sometimes not to double down, difficult to choose one.