Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: Insuring a natural in Spanish 21.

  1. #1
    Senior Member Jabberwocky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Agharta
    Posts
    1,868


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Insuring a natural in Spanish 21.

    Wondering what's the edge betting dealer has a T hole card being paid 2-1 when count is +6 or better using Zen II?

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    3rd rock from Sol, Milky Way Galaxy
    Posts
    14,158


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by Jabberwocky View Post
    Wondering what's the edge betting dealer has a T hole card being paid 2-1 when count is +6 or better using Zen II?
    You don't have an edge in SP21. Kat wrote you could play a lifetime and never see a true advantage insurance bet. It wasn't an exaggeration. I wouldn't quote my fuzzy memory numbers but when simmed the number of times you have an advantage with the insurance bet is something like 0.00001% of the time the dealer has an ace up. Don't trust my fuzzy memory. Look at the stats.

    In an 8 deck shoe there are 3 T's for 12 ranks or 96 T's in 384 cards with 288 non T's. You would need to remove 96 non-tens (1/3rd of all the non-tens) to get insurance to be an even money proposition. For each T you removed in the process you would need to remove 2 additional non-tens. To get insurance to be a plus EV just think about what the count would need to be. If the count is ace reckoned it would need to be even higher. If you used a perfect insurance count with each T tagged -3 and each non-T tagged +1 removing 96 non-tens without removing a T would leave exactly 6 decks left and RC of +96 for a TC of exactly +16. Think about that.

  3. #3
    Senior Member Jabberwocky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Agharta
    Posts
    1,868


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by Tthree View Post
    You don't have an edge in SP21. Kat wrote you could play a lifetime and never see a true advantage insurance bet. It wasn't an exaggeration. I wouldn't quote my fuzzy memory numbers but when simmed the number of times you have an advantage with the insurance bet is something like 0.00001% of the time the dealer has an ace up. Don't trust my fuzzy memory. Look at the stats.

    In an 8 deck shoe there are 3 T's for 12 ranks or 96 T's in 384 cards with 288 non T's. You would need to remove 96 non-tens (1/3rd of all the non-tens) to get insurance to be an even money proposition. For each T you removed in the process you would need to remove 2 additional non-tens. To get insurance to be a plus EV just think about what the count would need to be. If the count is ace reckoned it would need to be even higher. If you used a perfect insurance count with each T tagged -3 and each non-T tagged +1 removing 96 non-tens without removing a T would leave exactly 6 decks left and RC of +96 for a TC of exactly +16. Think about that.
    What if it's DD Spanish 21?

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    3rd rock from Sol, Milky Way Galaxy
    Posts
    14,158


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by Jabberwocky View Post
    What if it's DD Spanish 21?
    Of course insurance would become 0 EV bet far more frequently. Instead of having 96 multiplications of between 3/4 and 2/3 you would only have 24. You start with 24 T's and 72 non-tens. You would need to remove 24 non-tens (1/4 of the cards being used) leaving 48 non-tens without removing a T just to make the insurance edge 0. That would leave 1.5 decks remaining and a RC of +24 for the perfect insurance count for a TC of +16. To get an idea of the odds that this will happen you start with a 3/4 chance of drawing a non-ten. By the time you draw out the 24th non-ten the odds are about 2/3 chance of drawing a non-ten.

    The actual odds are:
    72/96*71/95*70/94*69/93*68/92*67/91*66/90*65/89*64/88*63/87*62/86*61/85*60/84*59/83*58/82*57/81*56/80*55/79*54/78*53/77*52/76*51/75*50/74*49/73 = 0.0003045. which is 1 in about every 3,284 times off the top of the deck. To get a general idea of the 96 multiples for the same calculation for 8 decks we can take this to the 4th power and get 0.0000000000008597. Or less than 1 in every 100,000,000,000 times (less than 1 in every 100 billion times).

    Of course there are other ways to get to +16 TC than just removing that many non-tens in a row (removing 1/3rd of all the non-face cards) but it is impossible to get to 0 EV insurance until you remove at least 1/4 of the cards being used. And for every face card removed you must remove 2 additional non-faces. I am not sure how deeply dealt a DD game of SP21 is because the fewest decks I am aware of being used is a 5 deck game. That is very rare. The H17 version typically deals 6 decks and the S17 version 8 decks.

  5. #5
    Banned or Suspended
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Eastern U S A
    Posts
    6,830


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    A few years ago I became (very briefly) excited about a DD Spanish21 game.
    The excitement quickly evaporated when I noted the ludicrous table max bet.

  6. #6
    Senior Member Jabberwocky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Agharta
    Posts
    1,868


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by ZenMaster_Flash View Post
    A few years ago I became (very briefly) excited about a DD Spanish21 game.
    The excitement quickly evaporated when I noted the ludicrous table max bet.
    Care to name the state?

  7. #7
    Banned or Suspended
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Eastern U S A
    Posts
    6,830


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by Jabberwocky View Post
    "Care to name the state?"
    California

  8. #8


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Yesterday I got dealt two 20s on two maxbets against a dealer ace and the TC was about +10.
    Of course she got a blackjack.
    I really thought about insuring. But then I thought, the last time I did that in similar conditions, the dealer didn't get blackjack but drew to 21 (after getting to hard 16).
    I.... feel so right doing the Wong thing!!! 9-5! 9-5! 9-5! Every king that screws her makes me feel alive!!

  9. #9


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    At TC+10 the correct play is to insure. Who cares what happened last time?



    Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

  10. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Melbourne.
    Posts
    803


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by RCJH View Post
    At TC+10 the correct play is to insure. Who cares what happened last time?



    Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
    I believe Mickey plays Pontoon. I'm not sure about indexes with that game, but perhaps it wasn't +EV to insure.

  11. #11


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by Koz84 View Post
    I believe Mickey plays Pontoon. I'm not sure about indexes with that game, but perhaps it wasn't +EV to insure.
    I should have read closer. My apologies; I made an incorrect assumption.

    Sent from my SM-G920V using Tapatalk

Similar Threads

  1. Natural 21
    By FerrisB in forum General Blackjack Forum
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 10-04-2015, 08:13 AM
  2. Insuring a stiff hand
    By Bigdaddy in forum General Blackjack Forum
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 06-30-2015, 02:59 PM
  3. ETZ: Not a natural after a split
    By ETZ in forum Blackjack Beginners
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 04-29-2004, 09:58 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

About Blackjack: The Forum

BJTF is an advantage player site based on the principles of comity. That is, civil and considerate behavior for the mutual benefit of all involved. The goal of advantage play is the legal extraction of funds from gaming establishments by gaining a mathematic advantage and developing the skills required to use that advantage. To maximize our success, it is important to understand that we are all on the same side. Personal conflicts simply get in the way of our goals.