Help with simulation in CVDATA

[G Man]

Bigdaddy and Three, you are missing this entire discussion.
THE DRAVOT TWEAK OPTION IS EXACTLY WHAT I DESCRIBE.
It's not Voodoo. If you don't understand the use of this type of counting, do not say anyhing that goes thru your mind....
True, you don't know how many Aces have been counted, but one thing is SURE, counting those on the table WILL NOT help you make an insurance decision.

[Norm]

It's not voodoo. Just a very minor gain.

[G Man]

Right!
And I'm not a user :-)

[Bigdaddy]

Bigdaddy and Three, you are missing this entire discussion.
THE DRAVOT TWEAK OPTION IS EXACTLY WHAT I DESCRIBE.
It's not Voodoo. If you don't understand the use of this type of counting, do not say anyhing that goes thru your mind....
True, you don't know how many Aces have been counted, but one thing is SURE, counting those on the table WILL NOT help you make an insurance decision.

Ok - I see. You are correct. I was thinking of TKO (which I use). I was thinking that it would be folly to adjust the true count for Aces seen only in the present round. But since regular KO sets the insurance bet at a fixed running count, then yes, you will improve your results slightly by ignoring the Aces seen in the present round.

[G Man]

Point made but as Norm pointed, it's no big deal.

[Three]

Point made but as Norm pointed, it's no big deal.

I thought Tthree pointed it out first:

If the aces on the table swing the decision there isn't much EV there to begin with.