See the top rated post in this thread. Click here

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 13 of 17

Thread: Silver Fox strategy vs Hi Lo?

  1. #1


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Silver Fox strategy vs Hi Lo?

    I have used both, and am ambivalent on which of the two is the better strategy?....My biggest concern is the wisdom (or lack thereof) of counting 9 as -1 as in Silver Fox, vs counting 9 as 0 as in Hi Low?......I play only SD & DD on a quarter table with a 1 to 3 spread, and I modify basic as the C dictates.....Any and all comments/viewpoints/banter or criticism would be greatly appreciated....
    Last edited by Ronster; 12-11-2016 at 11:51 AM.

  2. #2
    Banned or Suspended
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Eastern U S A
    Posts
    6,830


    1 out of 1 members found this post helpful. Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No


    You are negating most of the House Edge,
    presuming that this is a H17, DAS, NRSA
    for a House Edge of 0.40%

    You have negated most of the House Edge,
    but not all.

  3. #3
    Senior Member bigplayer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Las Vegas, NV
    Posts
    1,807


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Counting the 7 and 9 against each other helps your playing and betting correlation a bit, but hurts you on insurance decisions. Here is a great article from the Blackjack Forum archives. http://www.blackjackforumonline.com/content/hundred.htm

  4. #4
    Senior Member bigplayer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Las Vegas, NV
    Posts
    1,807


    1 out of 1 members found this post helpful. Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by moses View Post
    If anything, you are probably throwing EITS counters off by including the 9 and the 7. Including the 7 in your count will help decisions on that pesky 14 vs 10 matchup.
    Not likely. They will find the same edges that you find almost everytime just using high low and computer systems like Bloodhound rely on inputing the exact cards and using Griffin's EOR's to determine your exact betting correlation. There are other ways to beat evaluations from the eye but using multiple level card count systems isn't one of them. The key is knowing you are being evaluated or scheduled to be evaluated in the first place. Then there are all sorts of proprietary tricks of the trade to make yourself look like an idiot.

  5. #5


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    There's nothing wrong with the Silver Fox system if you're already using it.
    The Cash Cow.

  6. #6
    Banned or Suspended
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Eastern U S A
    Posts
    6,830


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    In post #4 there is a reference to:

    http://www.blackjackforumonline.com/content/hundred.htm


    Naturally, the Bishop Snyder, touts his ZEN system as the most profitable;

    BUT he mentions in the text of the article that he prefers using Hi-Opt II.

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    3rd rock from Sol, Milky Way Galaxy
    Posts
    14,158


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Here is what Bishop Snyder says on the subject in the following link:
    Quote Originally Posted by ZenMaster_Flash View Post
    http://www.blackjackforumonline.com/content/hundred.htm
    "The top-ranked (level two) Zen Count is simpler than any of the next three counts which are level 3, level 4, and level 3, respectively. As I noted earlier, I use the Hi-Opt II count. My reason for this is that the gain from using the Zen Count is very slight, and frankly Hi-Opt II is slightly simpler. I'm a great believer in simplicity. Nor could I say for certain that the Zen Count is undeniably superior. The Blackjack Formula indicates a negligible superiority under most conditions."

    I never tried the Zen count but I am not sure why you would think it was harder. Certainly using the info gathered is harder for Hiopt2/ASC. I don't see much difference in counting difficulty once the simple task of keeping a side count is mastered. Before you have the basic skill of side counting down Hiopt2/ASC is harder than Zen.

  8. #8


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Meaning what Moo?....that I could have started with something better than a level 1 such as Silver Fox?...Between the two - Silver Fox and Hi Lo - which do you believe is the more accurate/advantageous/profitable, playing against SD and/or DD with 70% pen and using modified basic?.....Many thanks beforehand, to you and all that have replied to my post....ronster

  9. #9


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by Ronster View Post
    Meaning what Moo?....that I could have started with something better than a level 1 such as Silver Fox?...Between the two - Silver Fox and Hi Lo - which do you believe is the more accurate/advantageous/profitable, playing against SD and/or DD with 70% pen and using modified basic?.....Many thanks beforehand, to you and all that have replied to my post....ronster
    If you've sunk a bunch of time into learning the system and indexes, then Silver Fox will work. Hi Lo is a bit better (maybe 5%), but that's not very important.
    The Cash Cow.

  10. #10


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Thanks for the info moses....but on the other hand I'm wondering why the "flash" tells me I'm using the absolute worst strategy out there???....It seems to work for me here on the river, with no heat whatsoever, and I've managed to tame the volatility by using a 1-3 spread....But then I'm playing SD & DD, only, no shoes....

  11. #11
    Banned or Suspended
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Eastern U S A
    Posts
    6,830


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by Ronster View Post
    " ... wondering why the "flash" tells me ..."


    I have been a Professional BJ Player since 1992;
    I mention this because I have no 'earned income',
    ergo, my "skills pay the bills." I MUST win.
    Most persons who congregate here are not professional,
    so they are primarily interested in "recreational" play,
    for modest sums, for perhaps once per week, etc.

    Your count has a poor Betting Correlation, poor Playing
    Efficiency, and a weak Insurance Correlation.

    That means that "bet-sizing" is inaccurate;
    and "Playing Efficiency" (delineating violations
    of Basic Strategy) is incomparably weak.

  12. #12


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Thanks Moses, appreciate the input....Which strategy do you like/use?......ronster

  13. #13


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Moses:......Here in Laughlin, if one uses common sense, a 1-3 spread on a quarter table, SD/DD, 3:2, with good pen, there is no problem with the guy in the sky as far as tracking you. I've found over the years that using Silver Fox & modified basic, a 1-3 spread, (which for me tames volatility considerably) will garner little if any heat. And by common sense I mean playing 1 hour, no more, win or lose, walk away; spread to different joints & different shifts.....And, after having used the (simplified) Silver Fox for so many years, I am able to romance the cocktail girl, watch the keno board, and banter with the guy next to me, all while keeping an accurate C, which also puts them to sleep up above. I also stay completely away from 3rd base. I always sit on 1st, or as close to it as I can get, which in turn dials down the heat with the pit as well as the eye in the sky....

    Popular consensus here on this site would have me believe the above is a recipe for disaster, but I've been here nearly 50 years and have found that is not the case. I have lived quite comfortably over the years and have never lost a joint here. Reno yes, but not here......(Oh, one also must very discreetly rat-hole checks and cash them in on different shifts/different joints, which is paramount)....And yes, I admit I do not come close to winning the kind of bucks that others are winning here on the site, but my nut is low, in that I do not have to travel, which incurs ungodly expense as you know....... I do love this site tho and read with relish the daily posts.....ronster
    Last edited by Ronster; 12-13-2016 at 08:06 AM.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Have anybody been playing in Silver Seven casino in Las Vegas?
    By seriousplayer in forum General Blackjack Forum
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 12-16-2015, 12:34 PM
  2. silver oak online casino
    By blackjacktim in forum General Blackjack Forum
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 02-19-2014, 04:02 PM
  3. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 08-10-2001, 03:56 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

About Blackjack: The Forum

BJTF is an advantage player site based on the principles of comity. That is, civil and considerate behavior for the mutual benefit of all involved. The goal of advantage play is the legal extraction of funds from gaming establishments by gaining a mathematic advantage and developing the skills required to use that advantage. To maximize our success, it is important to understand that we are all on the same side. Personal conflicts simply get in the way of our goals.